[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/kbl: Introduce Kabylake platform defition.

[Rodrigo Vivi]

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 04:16:45AM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
>
>> +static const struct intel_device_info intel_kabylake_info = {
>> +     .is_preliminary = 1,
>> +     .is_kabylake = 1,
>> +     .gen = 9,
>> +     .num_pipes = 3,
>> +     .need_gfx_hws = 1, .has_hotplug = 1,
>> +     .ring_mask = RENDER_RING | BSD_RING | BLT_RING | VEBOX_RING,
>> +     .has_llc = 1,
>> +     .has_ddi = 1,
>> +     .has_fpga_dbg = 1,
>> +     .has_fbc = 1,
>> +     GEN_DEFAULT_PIPEOFFSETS,
>> +     IVB_CURSOR_OFFSETS,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct intel_device_info intel_kabylake_gt3_info = {
>> +     .is_preliminary = 1,
>> +     .is_kabylake = 1,
>> +     .gen = 9,
>> +     .num_pipes = 3,
>> +     .need_gfx_hws = 1, .has_hotplug = 1,
>> +     .ring_mask = RENDER_RING | BSD_RING | BLT_RING | VEBOX_RING | BSD2_RING,
>> +     .has_llc = 1,
>> +     .has_ddi = 1,
>> +     .has_fpga_dbg = 1,
>> +     .has_fbc = 1,
>> +     GEN_DEFAULT_PIPEOFFSETS,
>> +     IVB_CURSOR_OFFSETS,
>> +};
>
> Let's play spot the difference. Or you could share the base kabylake
> definitions as a macro and override the different fields.

yeap, just following the style it was already there...

there are other things here that I don't like as well like has_fbc=1 here and
 HAS_<other_features> as defines...
I believe we need a re-org on the platform definitions...

to be done in a follow-up series...

> -Chris
>
> --
> Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx



-- 
Rodrigo Vivi
Blog: http://blog.vivi.eng.br