[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] igt/kms_rotation_crc: Add a subtest to validate Y-tiled obj + Y fb modifier (v5)
Tvrtko Ursulin
tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Fri Oct 30 03:22:08 PDT 2015
On 30/10/15 01:44, Vivek Kasireddy wrote:
> The main goal of this subtest is to trigger the following warning in
> the function i915_gem_object_get_fence():
> if (WARN_ON(!obj->map_and_fenceable))
>
> To trigger this warning, the subtest first creates a Y-tiled object and
> an associated framebuffer with the Y-fb modifier. Furthermore, to
> prevent the map_and_fenceable from being set, we make sure that
> the object does not have a normal VMA by refraining from rendering to the
> object and by setting the rotation property upfront before calling commit.
>
> v2: Do not call paint_squares and just use one output.
>
> v3: Convert an if condition to igt_require and move the plane rotation
> requirement further up before the fb allocation.
>
> v4: After setting rotation to 90 and committing, change the rotation to
> 0 and commit once more. This is to test if the i915 driver hits any
> warnings while pinning and unpinning an object that has both normal
> and rotated views.
>
> v5:
> - Add another subtest to toggle the order of rotation
> - Exhaustively test the i915 driver's pinning and unpinning code paths
> for any fence leaks by iterating until MAX available fences.
>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Kasireddy <vivek.kasireddy at intel.com>
> ---
> tests/kms_rotation_crc.c | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 84 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/kms_rotation_crc.c b/tests/kms_rotation_crc.c
> index cc9847e..34f8150 100644
> --- a/tests/kms_rotation_crc.c
> +++ b/tests/kms_rotation_crc.c
> @@ -264,6 +264,80 @@ static void test_plane_rotation(data_t *data, enum igt_plane plane_type)
> igt_require_f(valid_tests, "no valid crtc/connector combinations found\n");
> }
>
> +static void test_plane_rotation_ytiled_obj(data_t *data, enum igt_plane plane_type,
> + int toggle)
> +{
> + igt_display_t *display = &data->display;
> + uint64_t tiling = LOCAL_I915_FORMAT_MOD_Y_TILED;
> + uint32_t format = DRM_FORMAT_XRGB8888;
> + int bpp = igt_drm_format_to_bpp(format);
> + enum igt_commit_style commit = COMMIT_LEGACY;
> + int fd = data->gfx_fd;
> + igt_output_t *output = &display->outputs[0];
> + igt_plane_t *plane;
> + drmModeModeInfo *mode;
> + unsigned int stride, size, w, h;
> + uint32_t gem_handle;
> + int num_fences = gem_available_fences(fd);
> + int i, ret;
> +
> + igt_require(output != NULL && output->valid == true);
> +
> + plane = igt_output_get_plane(output, plane_type);
> + igt_require(igt_plane_supports_rotation(plane));
> +
> + if (plane_type == IGT_PLANE_PRIMARY || plane_type == IGT_PLANE_CURSOR) {
> + igt_require(data->display.has_universal_planes);
> + commit = COMMIT_UNIVERSAL;
> + }
> +
> + mode = igt_output_get_mode(output);
> + w = mode->hdisplay;
> + h = mode->vdisplay;
> +
> + for (stride = 512; stride < (w * bpp / 8); stride *= 2)
> + ;
> + for (size = 1024*1024; size < stride * h; size *= 2)
> + ;
> +
> + gem_handle = gem_create(fd, size);
> + ret = __gem_set_tiling(fd, gem_handle, I915_TILING_Y, stride);
> + igt_assert(ret == 0);
> +
> + do_or_die(__kms_addfb(fd, gem_handle, w, h, stride,
> + format, tiling, LOCAL_DRM_MODE_FB_MODIFIERS,
> + &data->fb.fb_id));
> + data->fb.width = w;
> + data->fb.height = h;
> + data->fb.gem_handle = gem_handle;
> +
> + igt_plane_set_fb(plane, NULL);
> + igt_display_commit(display);
> +
> + igt_plane_set_fb(plane, &data->fb);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < num_fences + 1; i++) {
> + igt_plane_set_rotation(plane, toggle ? IGT_ROTATION_0 : IGT_ROTATION_90);
> + drmModeObjectSetProperty(fd, plane->drm_plane->plane_id,
> + DRM_MODE_OBJECT_PLANE,
> + plane->rotation_property,
> + plane->rotation);
> + ret = igt_display_try_commit2(display, commit);
> + igt_assert(ret == 0);
> +
> + igt_plane_set_rotation(plane, toggle ? IGT_ROTATION_90 : IGT_ROTATION_0);
> + drmModeObjectSetProperty(fd, plane->drm_plane->plane_id,
> + DRM_MODE_OBJECT_PLANE,
> + plane->rotation_property,
> + plane->rotation);
> + ret = igt_display_try_commit2(display, commit);
> + igt_assert(ret == 0);
> + }
It manages to exhaust the fences with only one object? I was expecting
that multiple objects will be required since if it is only one how come
it allocates more than one fence register?
Regards,
Tvrtko
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list