[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 4/4] drm/i915: set proper N/CTS in modeset

[Takashi Iwai]

On Fri, 04 Sep 2015 03:56:26 +0200,
Yang, Libin wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Takashi Iwai [mailto:tiwai at suse.de]
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 11:36 PM
> > To: Daniel Vetter
> > Cc: Jani Nikula; Yang, Libin; alsa-devel at alsa-project.org; intel-
> > gfx at lists.freedesktop.org; daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch;
> > ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/4] drm/i915: set proper N/CTS in modeset
> > 
> > On Wed, 02 Sep 2015 17:22:01 +0200,
> > Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 03:46:40PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 02 Sep 2015 15:44:34 +0200,
> > > > Jani Nikula wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, 02 Sep 2015, Takashi Iwai <tiwai at suse.de> wrote:
> > > > > > On Wed, 02 Sep 2015 11:02:42 +0200,
> > > > > > Jani Nikula wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> >> Nitpick. I'd prefer some sharing with the similar blocks from
> > the
> > > > > >> >> earlier patch. Also a debug message on n == 0 would be
> > nice; you
> > > > > >> >> probably didn't notice your audio_config_get_rate() wasn't
> > working
> > > > > >> >> right
> > > > > >> >> because this silently fell back to the automatic mode here.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > OK, I will add the msg. As you and Ville are insisting on
> > > > > >> > sharing code, I will do it in next version.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Well, really, I'm fine with having that part duplicated as-is for
> > now,
> > > > > >> we can fix it later. More important to focus on getting
> > > > > >> audio_config_get_rate() right.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> I don't know if you're still targeting v4.3 with this (up to
> > Takashi I
> > > > > >> guess) we'll really need to wrap this up soon.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm in favor of merging this into 4.3, so it'd be appreciated if
> > Libin
> > > > > > can prepare the fixed version soonish, indeed.
> > > > >
> > > > > IIUC patches 1-3 would be useful on their own already, and a
> > fixed
> > > > > version of patch 4 could follow. Just a thought.
> > > >
> > > > That's good, then I can take the first three patches.
> > > >
> > > > Daniel, would you like to review these three before I merge them?
> > > > I assumed your previous mail as a kind of ack to this series, too.
> > >
> > > fwiw ack on that plan, but given how much I made a mess out of
> > these two
> > > series and mixed them up I wouldn't trust me anyway ;-)
> > >
> > > Once the code settles I'll rebase/backmerge so that I can apply the
> > > follow-up documentation/kerneldoc work that's still getting done.
> > 
> > FYI, I've pushed a branch including Libin's patchset (but only patches
> > 1-3) just for checking.  Let me know if this looks OK.
> 
> Thanks, Takashi, Daniel, Jani and Ville.
> 
> So I need submit the 4th patch only next time, right?

Yes.


Takashi