[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/15] drm/i915: skl nv12 workarounds

Daniel Vetter daniel at ffwll.ch
Fri Sep 4 00:40:46 PDT 2015


On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 06:33:25PM +0000, Konduru, Chandra wrote:
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Daniel Vetter [mailto:daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch] On Behalf Of Daniel Vetter
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 1:02 AM
> > To: Konduru, Chandra
> > Cc: Daniel Vetter; intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org; Vetter, Daniel; Syrjala, Ville
> > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/15] drm/i915: skl nv12 workarounds
> > 
> > On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 01:44:06AM +0000, Konduru, Chandra wrote:
> > > > > -static char intel_get_stepping(struct drm_device *dev)
> > > > > +char intel_get_stepping(struct drm_device *dev)
> > > >
> > > > I guess we should have a new home for this now that it's used outside of
> > > > intel_csr.c Plus kerneldoc, as usual.
> > >
> > > Will add kerneldoc header and respun, but where do you want to move to?
> > 
> > If you want my dice-roll, I'd shovel it into intel_uncore.c for lack of
> > better home.
> > -Daniel
> I sent updated patch series couple days ago moving to intel_display.c.
> I hope that is fine. 

Imo intel_display.c is the wrong place since this isn't display-specific
really - stepping is for the entire device. intel_uncore.c, i915_drv.c or
i915_dma.c would all be suitable places.

> By the way, can you start giving RB tags for the patches you reviewed?

This isn't a full review, just a small thing I spotted while reading
patches.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list