[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: restrict unclaimed register checking
Zanoni, Paulo R
paulo.r.zanoni at intel.com
Fri Sep 4 06:38:07 PDT 2015
Em Sex, 2015-09-04 às 09:53 +0300, Mika Kuoppala escreveu:
> Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni at intel.com> writes:
>
> > The unclaimed register bit is only triggered when someone touches
> > the
> > specified register range.
> >
>
> I got the impression that we get the unclaimed access also
> for other ranges, if they are powered down during access?
The range is a conclusion after a discussion I had with Arthur (CCd) a
few months ago. Unfortunately I can't find the emails in my archive
here, so maybe he can comment.
But basically what I did was: put the machine in runtime suspend, open
debugfs/i915_forcewake_user (because if we don't grab forcewake we will
freeze the machine when reading some regs), then run this:
http://people.freedesktop.org/~pzanoni/fpga_dbg_range.c .
>
> -Mika
>
> > For the normal use case (with i915.mmio_debug=0), this commit will
> > avoid the extra __raw_i915_read32() call for every register outside
> > the specified range, at the expense of a few additional "if"
> > statements.
> >
> > v2: Put the register range checking earlier (Chris).
> >
> > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni at intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> > index 10c61a6..65e0ea8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> > @@ -595,6 +595,8 @@ void assert_forcewakes_inactive(struct
> > drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > !FORCEWAKE_GEN9_MEDIA_RANGE_OFFSET(reg) && \
> > !FORCEWAKE_GEN9_COMMON_RANGE_OFFSET(reg))
> >
> > +#define UNCLAIMED_CHECK_RANGE(reg) REG_RANGE(reg, 0x40000,
> > 0xC0000)
> > +
> > static void
> > ilk_dummy_write(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > {
> > @@ -611,6 +613,9 @@ hsw_unclaimed_reg_debug(struct drm_i915_private
> > *dev_priv, u32 reg, bool read,
> > const char *op = read ? "reading" : "writing to";
> > const char *when = before ? "before" : "after";
> >
> > + if (!UNCLAIMED_CHECK_RANGE(reg))
> > + return;
> > +
> > if (!i915.mmio_debug)
> > return;
> >
> > @@ -623,10 +628,13 @@ hsw_unclaimed_reg_debug(struct
> > drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 reg, bool read,
> > }
> >
> > static void
> > -hsw_unclaimed_reg_detect(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > +hsw_unclaimed_reg_detect(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32
> > reg)
> > {
> > static bool mmio_debug_once = true;
> >
> > + if (!UNCLAIMED_CHECK_RANGE(reg))
> > + return;
> > +
> > if (i915.mmio_debug || !mmio_debug_once)
> > return;
> >
> > @@ -892,7 +900,7 @@ hsw_write##x(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > off_t reg, u##x val, bool trace)
> > gen6_gt_check_fifodbg(dev_priv); \
> > } \
> > hsw_unclaimed_reg_debug(dev_priv, reg, false, false); \
> > - hsw_unclaimed_reg_detect(dev_priv); \
> > + hsw_unclaimed_reg_detect(dev_priv, reg); \
> > GEN6_WRITE_FOOTER; \
> > }
> >
> > @@ -934,7 +942,7 @@ gen8_write##x(struct drm_i915_private
> > *dev_priv, off_t reg, u##x val, bool trace
> > __force_wake_get(dev_priv, FORCEWAKE_RENDER); \
> > __raw_i915_write##x(dev_priv, reg, val); \
> > hsw_unclaimed_reg_debug(dev_priv, reg, false, false); \
> > - hsw_unclaimed_reg_detect(dev_priv); \
> > + hsw_unclaimed_reg_detect(dev_priv, reg); \
> > GEN6_WRITE_FOOTER; \
> > }
> >
> > @@ -1000,7 +1008,7 @@ gen9_write##x(struct drm_i915_private
> > *dev_priv, off_t reg, u##x val, \
> > __force_wake_get(dev_priv, fw_engine); \
> > __raw_i915_write##x(dev_priv, reg, val); \
> > hsw_unclaimed_reg_debug(dev_priv, reg, false, false); \
> > - hsw_unclaimed_reg_detect(dev_priv); \
> > + hsw_unclaimed_reg_detect(dev_priv, reg); \
> > GEN6_WRITE_FOOTER; \
> > }
> >
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list