[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: fix crash in error state readout on non-execlist platforms
Yu Dai
yu.dai at intel.com
Thu Sep 10 15:07:00 PDT 2015
Agree. The LRC prefix is confusing. Thanks for the patch. -Alex
On 09/10/2015 02:58 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> That looks like it would, but I think it's still confusing to reference LRC state when we haven't initialized execlists at all...
>
> Jesse
>
> On 09/10/2015 02:56 PM, Yu Dai wrote:
> > Jesse,
> >
> > Will the patch here fix the issue? It should help other cases where LRC_PPHWSP_PN is referenced on non-execlist / guc platforms.
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.h
> > index 4cc54b3..233a930 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.h
> > @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ static inline void intel_logical_ring_emit(struct intel_ringbuffer *ringbuf,
> >
> > /* One extra page is added before LRC for GuC as shared data */
> > #define LRC_GUCSHR_PN (0)
> > -#define LRC_PPHWSP_PN (LRC_GUCSHR_PN + 1)
> > +#define LRC_PPHWSP_PN (LRC_GUCSHR_PN + i915.enable_guc_submission ? 1 : 0)
> > #define LRC_STATE_PN (LRC_PPHWSP_PN + 1)
> >
> > void intel_lr_context_free(struct intel_context *ctx);
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Alex
> >
> > On 09/10/2015 02:40 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> >> Looks like this was introduced in:
> >> commit d1675198ed1f21aec6e036336e4340c40b726497
> >> Author: Alex Dai <yu.dai at intel.com>
> >> Date: Wed Aug 12 15:43:43 2015 +0100
> >>
> >> drm/i915: Integrate GuC-based command submission
> >>
> >> This patch assumed LRC contexts and HWS layout, which is incorrect on
> >> platforms without execlists. This can lead to a crash in GPU error
> >> state readout on those platforms.
> >>
> >> I don't see a bug filed for this, but there may be one that I haven't
> >> found.
> >>
> >> Cc: Alex Dai <yu.dai at intel.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes at virtuousgeek.org>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
> >> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> >> index 3379f9c..d0822f8 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> >> @@ -457,17 +457,24 @@ int i915_error_state_to_str(struct drm_i915_error_state_buf *m,
> >> }
> >> if ((obj = error->ring[i].hws_page)) {
> >> + u64 hws_offset = lower_32_bits(obj->gtt_offset);
> >> + u32 *hws_page = &obj->pages[0][0];
> >> +
> >> + if (i915.enable_execlists) {
> >> + hws_offset = obj->gtt_offset + LRC_PPHWSP_PN *
> >> + PAGE_SIZE;
> >> + hws_page = &obj->pages[LRC_PPHWSP_PN][0];
> >> + }
> >> err_printf(m, "%s --- HW Status = 0x%08llx\n",
> >> - dev_priv->ring[i].name,
> >> - obj->gtt_offset + LRC_PPHWSP_PN * PAGE_SIZE);
> >> + dev_priv->ring[i].name, hws_offset);
> >> offset = 0;
> >> for (elt = 0; elt < PAGE_SIZE/16; elt += 4) {
> >> err_printf(m, "[%04x] %08x %08x %08x %08x\n",
> >> offset,
> >> - obj->pages[LRC_PPHWSP_PN][elt],
> >> - obj->pages[LRC_PPHWSP_PN][elt+1],
> >> - obj->pages[LRC_PPHWSP_PN][elt+2],
> >> - obj->pages[LRC_PPHWSP_PN][elt+3]);
> >> + hws_page[elt],
> >> + hws_page[elt+1],
> >> + hws_page[elt+2],
> >> + hws_page[elt+3]);
> >> offset += 16;
> >> }
> >> }
> >
> >
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list