[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Move scanline_offset and timestamping constant setup to intel_modeset_readout_hw_state()

[Ville Syrjälä]

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 01:57:45PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 10-09-15 om 17:59 schreef ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> >
> > intel_modeset_readout_hw_state() seems like the more appropriate place
> > for populating the scanline_offset and timestamping constants than
> > intel_sanitize_crtc() since they are basically part of the state we
> > read out.
> >
> > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.jakobsson at linux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 5 +++--
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > index 5fed120..88d9466 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > @@ -14918,8 +14918,6 @@ static void intel_sanitize_crtc(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> >  	if (crtc->active) {
> >  		struct intel_plane *plane;
> >  
> > -		drm_calc_timestamping_constants(&crtc->base, &crtc->base.hwmode);
> > -		update_scanline_offset(crtc);
> >  		drm_crtc_vblank_on(&crtc->base);
> >  
> >  		/* Disable everything but the primary plane */
> > @@ -15216,6 +15214,9 @@ static void intel_modeset_readout_hw_state(struct drm_device *dev)
> >  			 * recalculation.
> >  			 */
> >  			crtc->base.state->mode.private_flags = I915_MODE_FLAG_INHERITED;
> > +
> > +			drm_calc_timestamping_constants(&crtc->base, &crtc->base.hwmode);
> > +			update_scanline_offset(crtc);
> >  		}
> >  	}
> >  }
> Can you move drm_vblank_reset and drm_vblank_on too?

I'm not sure I really want to move those. They can actually modify
the hardware state, so I don't think they really belong in
intel_modeset_readout_hw_state(). intel_sanitize_crtc() feels like
a better fit.

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC