[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/10] drm/i915: Use atomic plane state in the primary plane update.

[Ville Syrjälä]

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 04:23:35PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 04:27:23PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 04:07:56PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 4 +++-
> > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > > index 80a98bffd5ba..33200403a5db 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > > @@ -13448,7 +13448,9 @@ intel_commit_primary_plane(struct drm_plane *plane,
> > >  	if (!crtc->state->active)
> > >  		return;
> > >  
> > > -	dev_priv->display.update_primary_plane(crtc, fb, crtc->x, crtc->y);
> > > +	dev_priv->display.update_primary_plane(crtc, fb,
> > > +					       state->src.x1 >> 16,
> > > +					       state->src.y1 >> 16);
> > >  }
> > 
> > You know I posted a pile of patches last spring to start cleaning up
> > this mess. Maybe someone wants to rescue the patches and avoid some
> > duplicate work?
> > 
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2015-March/061715.html
> 
> I double-checked that series again and I pulled in the first 3 patches
> (which had an r-b), but for patches 4+ there's been some inconclusive
> discussion afaict from a quick look. Did I miss a resend somewhere?

Nah. I think the patches cleaning up the primary plane junk had an r-b,
but I guess those were patches 5-6. But given how bad atomic/plane state
was at the time, I'm sure those couldn't have been applied safely w/o
patch 4. One might hope things have gotten better since then, but I
can't be sure.

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC