[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] tests/gem_ctx_param_basic: fix up non-root-set-no-zeromap subtest
Jesse Barnes
jbarnes at virtuousgeek.org
Thu Sep 17 09:41:19 PDT 2015
This subtest is trying to set the no-zeromap flag on the context without
root privs. Rather than expecting an EPERM on what's presumably a
nonzero value, we should expect success on a set call w/o root privs.
This looks like a copy & paste error from when the subtest was added,
since setting the ban period has different expected behavior.
Cc: David Weinehall <david.weinehall at linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes at virtuousgeek.org>
---
tests/gem_ctx_param_basic.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/gem_ctx_param_basic.c b/tests/gem_ctx_param_basic.c
index 6a1694d..f7d9592 100644
--- a/tests/gem_ctx_param_basic.c
+++ b/tests/gem_ctx_param_basic.c
@@ -126,8 +126,8 @@ igt_main
ctx_param.context = ctx;
TEST_SUCCESS(LOCAL_IOCTL_I915_GEM_CONTEXT_GETPARAM);
- ctx_param.value--;
- TEST_FAIL(LOCAL_IOCTL_I915_GEM_CONTEXT_SETPARAM, EPERM);
+ ctx_param.value = 0;
+ TEST_SUCCESS(LOCAL_IOCTL_I915_GEM_CONTEXT_SETPARAM);
}
igt_waitchildren();
--
1.9.1
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list