[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Skip fence installation for objects with rotated views

[Vivek Kasireddy]

On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 11:25:18 +0100
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com> wrote:

> 
> On 09/16/2015 06:36 PM, Vivek Kasireddy wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 09:03:33 +0100
> > Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 07:05:12PM -0700, Vivek Kasireddy wrote:
> >>> While pinning a fb object to the display plane, only install a
> >>> fence if the object is using a normal view. This corresponds with
> >>> the behavior found in i915_gem_object_do_pin() where the
> >>> fencability criteria is determined only for objects with normal
> >>> views.
> >>>
> >>> Suggested-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
> >>> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> >>> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Vivek Kasireddy <vivek.kasireddy at intel.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 3 ++-
> >>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> >>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c index 52fb3f2..8b3e943
> >>> 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> >>> @@ -2357,7 +2357,8 @@ intel_pin_and_fence_fb_obj(struct drm_plane
> >>> *plane,
> >>>   	 * framebuffer compression.  For simplicity, we always
> >>> install
> >>>   	 * a fence as the cost is not that onerous.
> >>>   	 */
> >>> -	ret = i915_gem_object_get_fence(obj);
> >>> +	ret = view.type == I915_GGTT_VIEW_NORMAL ?
> >>> +				i915_gem_object_get_fence(obj) :
> >>> 0;
> >>
> >> ret = 0;
> >> if (vma->map_and_fenceable)
> >> 	ret = i915_gem_object_get_fence(obj);
> >>
> >> is how I wrote it in my patch. One day that will become
> >> i915_vma_get_fence().
> >> -Chris
> > Hi Chris,
> >
> > Looks like your solution to this problem -- and potentially others
> > -- is better and more comprehensive. When do you plan on sending
> > your patch out to the mailing list?
> 
> For a quick fix maybe just respin this patch to use 
> obj->map_and_fenceable criteria as Chris suggested?
> 
> You should also add a test case for this into igt/kms_addfb_basic.
Hi Tvrtko,
I'll send out a patch soon that will serve as as stop-gap measure until
Chris revamps that part of the code. As far as the igt test case is
concerned, I'll do that in the next few days.


Thanks,
Vivek

> 
> Regards,
> 
> Tvrtko