[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/bxt: Set oscaledcompmethod to enable scale value
Sivakumar Thulasimani
sivakumar.thulasimani at intel.com
Tue Sep 22 11:31:40 PDT 2015
On 9/22/2015 6:32 PM, Imre Deak wrote:
> On ma, 2015-09-21 at 23:00 +0530, Sivakumar Thulasimani wrote:
>> Reviewed-by: Sivakumar Thulasimani <sivakumar.thulasimani at intel.com>
>>
>> On 9/18/2015 2:11 PM, Sonika Jindal wrote:
>>> Bspec update tells that we have to enable oscaledcompmethod instead of
>>> ouniqetrangenmethod for enabling scale value during swing programming.
>>> Also, scale value is 'don't care' for other levels except the last entry
>>> translation table. So, make it 0 instead of 0x9A.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jindal at intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 2 +-
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
>>> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>>> index 812b7b2..cec6546 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>>> @@ -1395,7 +1395,7 @@ enum skl_disp_power_wells {
>>> #define BXT_PORT_TX_DW3_LN0(port) _PORT3(port, _PORT_TX_DW3_LN0_A, \
>>> _PORT_TX_DW3_LN0_B, \
>>> _PORT_TX_DW3_LN0_C)
>>> -#define UNIQE_TRANGE_EN_METHOD (1 << 27)
>>> +#define SCALE_DCOMP_METHOD (1 << 26)
>>>
>>> #define _PORT_TX_DW4_LN0_A 0x162510
>>> #define _PORT_TX_DW4_LN0_B 0x6C510
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
>>> index fec51df..0d9b304 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
>>> @@ -261,15 +261,15 @@ struct bxt_ddi_buf_trans {
>>> */
>>> static const struct bxt_ddi_buf_trans bxt_ddi_translations_dp[] = {
>>> /* Idx NT mV diff db */
>>> - { 52, 0x9A, 0, 128, true }, /* 0: 400 0 */
>>> - { 78, 0x9A, 0, 85, false }, /* 1: 400 3.5 */
>>> - { 104, 0x9A, 0, 64, false }, /* 2: 400 6 */
>>> - { 154, 0x9A, 0, 43, false }, /* 3: 400 9.5 */
>>> - { 77, 0x9A, 0, 128, false }, /* 4: 600 0 */
>>> - { 116, 0x9A, 0, 85, false }, /* 5: 600 3.5 */
>>> - { 154, 0x9A, 0, 64, false }, /* 6: 600 6 */
>>> - { 102, 0x9A, 0, 128, false }, /* 7: 800 0 */
>>> - { 154, 0x9A, 0, 85, false }, /* 8: 800 3.5 */
>>> + { 52, 0, 0, 128, true }, /* 0: 400 0 */
>>> + { 78, 0, 0, 85, false }, /* 1: 400 3.5 */
>>> + { 104, 0, 0, 64, false }, /* 2: 400 6 */
>>> + { 154, 0, 0, 43, false }, /* 3: 400 9.5 */
>>> + { 77, 0, 0, 128, false }, /* 4: 600 0 */
>>> + { 116, 0, 0, 85, false }, /* 5: 600 3.5 */
>>> + { 154, 0, 0, 64, false }, /* 6: 600 6 */
>>> + { 102, 0, 0, 128, false }, /* 7: 800 0 */
>>> + { 154, 0, 0, 85, false }, /* 8: 800 3.5 */
> There is no point in changing the above values as they are don't-care in
> any case. In fact the reset value is 0x98 so I'd program that for these
> cases if we ever wanted to change them. For now I'd leave this as-is to
> keep in sync with the bxt_ddi_translations_hdmi table and also what CHV
> does.
>
>>> { 154, 0x9A, 1, 128, false }, /* 9: 1200 0 */
>>> };
>
>>>
>>> @@ -2151,9 +2151,9 @@ static void bxt_ddi_vswing_sequence(struct drm_device *dev, u32 level,
>>> I915_WRITE(BXT_PORT_TX_DW2_GRP(port), val);
>>>
>>> val = I915_READ(BXT_PORT_TX_DW3_LN0(port));
>>> - val &= ~UNIQE_TRANGE_EN_METHOD;
>>> + val &= ~SCALE_DCOMP_METHOD;
>>> if (ddi_translations[level].enable)
>>> - val |= UNIQE_TRANGE_EN_METHOD;
>>> + val |= SCALE_DCOMP_METHOD;
> Please still leave behind a DRM_ERROR in case UNIQE_TRANGE_EN_METHOD was
> set in the register and we are disabling scaling. The scaling value does
> seem to depend on this bit too, so seeing if it was set can help
> tracking down problems.
>
This was the only place UNIQE_TRANGE_EN_METHOD was set before, with that
removed
only possibility for it to be set is by GOP/VBIOS. (who are also
expected to make this change
if not done already.) in such a scenario wont an error message be
useless here ?
>>> I915_WRITE(BXT_PORT_TX_DW3_GRP(port), val);
>>>
>>> val = I915_READ(BXT_PORT_TX_DW4_LN0(port));
>
>
>
--
regards,
Sivakumar
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list