[Intel-gfx] [regression] [git pull] drm for 4.3

[Jani Nikula]

On Thu, 24 Sep 2015, "davej at codemonkey.org.uk" <davej at codemonkey.org.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 11:07:56AM +0000, Lankhorst, Maarten wrote:
>  > Hey,
>  > 
>  > Dave Jones schreef op di 22-09-2015 om 21:49 [-0400]:
>  > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 09:15:58AM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
>  > >  > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 05:13:55PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>  > >  > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 08:00:17AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
>  > >  > > > Cc'ing Maarten and Matt; I'm guessing this may be related to one of
>  > >  > > > their recent patches.
>  > >  > 
>  > >  > Sounds like this showed up before my recent work, but I think I might
>  > >  > have seen similar problems while working on atomic watermarks; the
>  > >  > issues I was seeing were because the initial hardware readout could
>  > >  > leave primary->visible set to true even when the CRTC was off.  My
>  > >  > series (which is still under development) contains this patch to fix
>  > >  > that:
>  > >  > 
>  > >  >         http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/59564/
>  > >  > 
>  > >  > Does applying that help with the problems reported here?
>  > > 
>  > > No difference at all for me.
>  > Looks like a (reopened) dup of 91952?
>  > 
>  > Can you apply "[PATCH] drm/i915: Add primary plane to mask if it's
>  > visible", and get me the results?
>
> This doesn't apply on top of Linus' current tree.
> If you let me know what it's dependant on, I'll do a build with
> those patches tomorrow.

It's now part of the drm-intel-fixes pull request [1], maybe it's
easiest to pull that in? Just four commits on top of
v4.3-rc2. Alternatively pick it up from our repo [2].

Thanks,
Jani.



[1] http://mid.gmane.org/87si646uyf.fsf@intel.com
[2] http://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel/commit/?h=drm-intel-fixes&id=721a09f7393de6c28a07516dccd654c6e995944a

>
> 	Dave
>  

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center