[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Add max DOT clock frequency to debugfs
Mika Kahola
mika.kahola at intel.com
Fri Sep 25 03:08:14 PDT 2015
On Thu, 2015-09-24 at 23:49 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 02:28:41PM +0300, Mika Kahola wrote:
> > Information on maximum supported pixel clock frequency to
> > i915_frequency_info.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola at intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> > index 6882455..b418d9b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> > @@ -1311,6 +1311,7 @@ static int i915_frequency_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> >
> > seq_printf(m, "Current CD clock freq: %dkHz\n", dev_priv->cdclk_freq);
> > seq_printf(m, "Max CD clock freq: %dkHz\n", dev_priv->max_cdclk_freq);
> > + seq_printf(m, "Max pixel clock freq: %dkHz\n", dev_priv->max_dotclk_freq);
>
> I would put a space between the number and units.
>
> The rest of the stuff in there is about the gt stuff, so not sure if
> this is the best place for it. But if no one else objects, I won't either.
>
> Could probably squash all three patches into just one, since they're all
> doing the same thing anyway.
>
> With that these are:
> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
>
Thanks! These patches are leftovers from the CD clock and mode validity
patch series. I'll combine all these three patches to one patch.
-Mika-
> >
> > out:
> > intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
> > --
> > 1.9.1
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list