[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 04/46] pwm: get rid of pwm->lock
Thierry Reding
thierry.reding at gmail.com
Tue Apr 12 11:22:46 UTC 2016
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:03:27PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> PWM devices are not protected against concurrent accesses. The lock in
> pwm_device might let PWM users think it is, but it's actually only
> protecting the enabled state.
>
> Removing this lock should be fine as long as all PWM users are aware that
> accesses to the PWM device have to be serialized, which seems to be the
> case for all of them except the sysfs interface.
> Patch the sysfs code by adding a lock to the pwm_export struct and making
> sure it's taken for all accesses to the exported PWM device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon at free-electrons.com>
> ---
> drivers/pwm/core.c | 19 ++++--------------
> drivers/pwm/sysfs.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> include/linux/pwm.h | 2 --
> 3 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
This is a little overzealous. Only accesses that can cause races need to
be protected by the lock. All of the *_show() callbacks don't modify the
PWM device in any way, so there is no need to protect them against
concurrent accesses.
I've dropped the changes when applying.
Thanks,
Thierry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20160412/ad8efca5/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list