[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4] drm/i915: Adjust size of PIPE_CONTROL used for gen8 render seqno write

[Mika Kuoppala]

Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue at linux.intel.com> writes:

> [ text/plain ]
>
>
> On 04/12/2016 04:51 PM, Michał Winiarski wrote:
>> We started to use PIPE_CONTROL to write render ring seqno in order to
>> combat seqno write vs interrupt generation problems. This was introduced
>> by commit 7c17d377374d ("drm/i915: Use ordered seqno write interrupt
>> generation on gen8+ execlists").
>> 
>> On gen8+ size of PIPE_CONTROL with Post Sync Operation should be
>> 6 dwords. When we're using older 5-dword variant it's possible to
>> observe inconsistent values written by PIPE_CONTROL with Post
>> Sync Operation from user batches, resulting in rendering corruptions.
>> 
>> v2: Fix BAT failures
>> v3: Comments on alignment and thrashing high dword of seqno (Chris)
>> v4: Updated commit msg (Mika)
>> 
>> Testcase: igt/gem_pipe_control_store_loop/*-qword-write
>> Issue: VIZ-7393
>> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
>> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at intel.com>
>> Cc: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue at linux.intel.com>
>
> Tested-by: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue at linux.intel.com>

Patch pushed to dinq. Thanks for patch, review and testing.

-Mika


>
>
>> Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski at intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 10 ++++++++--
>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
>> index 0d6dc5e..30abe53 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
>> @@ -1945,15 +1945,18 @@ static int gen8_emit_request_render(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
>>  	struct intel_ringbuffer *ringbuf = request->ringbuf;
>>  	int ret;
>>  
>> -	ret = intel_logical_ring_begin(request, 6 + WA_TAIL_DWORDS);
>> +	ret = intel_logical_ring_begin(request, 8 + WA_TAIL_DWORDS);
>>  	if (ret)
>>  		return ret;
>>  
>> +	/* We're using qword write, seqno should be aligned to 8 bytes. */
>> +	BUILD_BUG_ON(I915_GEM_HWS_INDEX & 1);
>> +
>>  	/* w/a for post sync ops following a GPGPU operation we
>>  	 * need a prior CS_STALL, which is emitted by the flush
>>  	 * following the batch.
>>  	 */
>> -	intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf, GFX_OP_PIPE_CONTROL(5));
>> +	intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf, GFX_OP_PIPE_CONTROL(6));
>>  	intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf,
>>  				(PIPE_CONTROL_GLOBAL_GTT_IVB |
>>  				 PIPE_CONTROL_CS_STALL |
>> @@ -1961,7 +1964,10 @@ static int gen8_emit_request_render(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
>>  	intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf, hws_seqno_address(request->engine));
>>  	intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf, 0);
>>  	intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf, i915_gem_request_get_seqno(request));
>> +	/* We're thrashing one dword of HWS. */
>> +	intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf, 0);
>>  	intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf, MI_USER_INTERRUPT);
>> +	intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf, MI_NOOP);
>>  	return intel_logical_ring_advance_and_submit(request);
>>  }
>>  
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx