[Intel-gfx] [CI-ping 11/15] drm/i915: Prevent machine death on Ivybridge context switching
Jani Nikula
jani.nikula at linux.intel.com
Mon Apr 18 09:50:35 UTC 2016
On Wed, 13 Apr 2016, Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 09:03:05PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
>> Two concurrent writes into the same register cacheline has the chance of
>> killing the machine on Ivybridge and other gen7. This includes LRI
>> emitted from the command parser. The MI_SET_CONTEXT itself serves as
>> serialising barrier and prevents the pair of register writes in the first
>> packet from triggering the fault. However, if a second switch-context
>> immediately occurs then we may have two adjacent blocks of LRI to the
>> same registers which may then trigger the hang. To counteract this we
>> need to insert a delay after the second register write using SRM.
>>
>> This is easiest to reproduce with something like
>> igt/gem_ctx_switch/interruptible that triggers back-to-back context
>> switches (with no operations in between them in the command stream,
>> which requires the execbuf operation to be interrupted after the
>> MI_SET_CONTEXT) but can be observed sporadically elsewhere when running
>> interruptible igt. No reports from the wild though, so it must be of low
>> enough frequency that no one has correlated the random machine freezes
>> with i915.ko
>>
>> The issue was introduced with
>> commit 2c550183476dfa25641309ae9a28d30feed14379 [v3.19]
>> Author: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
>> Date: Tue Dec 16 10:02:27 2014 +0000
>>
>> drm/i915: Disable PSMI sleep messages on all rings around context switches
>>
>> Testcase: igt/gem_ctx_switch/render-interruptible #ivb
>> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
>> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch>
>> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
FYI, this (*) does not cherry-pick cleanly to drm-intel-fixes.
BR,
Jani.
(*) Well, not exactly *this* but rather
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/80952/ which was not posted on
the list so I can't reply to it.
>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
>> index fe580cb9501a..e5ad7b21e356 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
>> @@ -539,7 +539,7 @@ mi_set_context(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req, u32 hw_flags)
>>
>> len = 4;
>> if (INTEL_INFO(engine->dev)->gen >= 7)
>> - len += 2 + (num_rings ? 4*num_rings + 2 : 0);
>> + len += 2 + (num_rings ? 4*num_rings + 6 : 0);
>>
>> ret = intel_ring_begin(req, len);
>> if (ret)
>> @@ -579,6 +579,7 @@ mi_set_context(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req, u32 hw_flags)
>> if (INTEL_INFO(engine->dev)->gen >= 7) {
>> if (num_rings) {
>> struct intel_engine_cs *signaller;
>> + i915_reg_t last_reg = {}; /* keep gcc quiet */
>>
>> intel_ring_emit(engine,
>> MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM(num_rings));
>> @@ -586,11 +587,19 @@ mi_set_context(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req, u32 hw_flags)
>> if (signaller == engine)
>> continue;
>>
>> - intel_ring_emit_reg(engine,
>> - RING_PSMI_CTL(signaller->mmio_base));
>> + last_reg = RING_PSMI_CTL(signaller->mmio_base);
>> + intel_ring_emit_reg(engine, last_reg);
>> intel_ring_emit(engine,
>> _MASKED_BIT_DISABLE(GEN6_PSMI_SLEEP_MSG_DISABLE));
>> }
>> +
>> + /* Insert a delay before the next switch! */
>> + intel_ring_emit(engine,
>> + MI_STORE_REGISTER_MEM |
>> + MI_SRM_LRM_GLOBAL_GTT);
>> + intel_ring_emit_reg(engine, last_reg);
>> + intel_ring_emit(engine, engine->scratch.gtt_offset);
>> + intel_ring_emit(engine, MI_NOOP);
>> }
>> intel_ring_emit(engine, MI_ARB_ON_OFF | MI_ARB_ENABLE);
>> }
>> --
>> 2.8.0.rc3
>>
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list