[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Ignore GTFIFODBG FIFO free entry fields on CHV

Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Wed Apr 20 13:11:58 UTC 2016


On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 02:47:57PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 03:28:51PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 11:37:49AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 09:09:30PM +0300, ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com wrote:
> > > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > > > 
> > > > On CHV GTFIFODBG has some read-only bits to indicate the number
> > > > of free FIFO entries. Ignore these when checking to see if any
> > > > of the sticky error bits are set.
> > > > 
> > > > This gets rid of these during device resume:
> > > > [drm:cherryview_enable_rps] GT fifo had a previous error 1080000
> > > > 
> > > > While at it, move the assignments out of the if().
> > > > 
> > > > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > > 
> > > Not entirely sure we don't want to filter even more, but these we want to
> > > filter for sure.
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
> > 
> > Pushed to dinq. Thanks for the review.
> 
> Maybe my mailer is broken, but did CI crunch on this? I don't spot it's
> mail anywhere ...

Hmm. Seems you're right. I must have been looking at the CI mail for
another series, or just plain forgotten to look for one. Pardon my
hastyness.

> -Daniel
> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > Also just realized that we don't check this on in the chv_write functions.
> > > Should we?
> > > -Daniel
> > > 
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 2 ++
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 9 ++++++---
> > > >  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > > > index cea5a390d8c9..a0eaefc77602 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > > > @@ -6866,6 +6866,8 @@ enum skl_disp_power_wells {
> > > >  #define  VLV_SPAREG2H				_MMIO(0xA194)
> > > >  
> > > >  #define  GTFIFODBG				_MMIO(0x120000)
> > > > +#define    GT_FIFO_SBDEDICATE_FREE_ENTRY_CHV	(0x1f << 20)
> > > > +#define    GT_FIFO_FREE_ENTRIES_CHV		(0x7f << 13)
> > > >  #define    GT_FIFO_SBDROPERR			(1<<6)
> > > >  #define    GT_FIFO_BLOBDROPERR			(1<<5)
> > > >  #define    GT_FIFO_SB_READ_ABORTERR		(1<<4)
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > > > index b8e395ad05ac..b7c218602c6e 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > > > @@ -4997,7 +4997,8 @@ static void gen6_enable_rps(struct drm_device *dev)
> > > >  	I915_WRITE(GEN6_RC_STATE, 0);
> > > >  
> > > >  	/* Clear the DBG now so we don't confuse earlier errors */
> > > > -	if ((gtfifodbg = I915_READ(GTFIFODBG))) {
> > > > +	gtfifodbg = I915_READ(GTFIFODBG);
> > > > +	if (gtfifodbg) {
> > > >  		DRM_ERROR("GT fifo had a previous error %x\n", gtfifodbg);
> > > >  		I915_WRITE(GTFIFODBG, gtfifodbg);
> > > >  	}
> > > > @@ -5528,7 +5529,8 @@ static void cherryview_enable_rps(struct drm_device *dev)
> > > >  
> > > >  	WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock));
> > > >  
> > > > -	gtfifodbg = I915_READ(GTFIFODBG);
> > > > +	gtfifodbg = I915_READ(GTFIFODBG) & ~(GT_FIFO_SBDEDICATE_FREE_ENTRY_CHV |
> > > > +					     GT_FIFO_FREE_ENTRIES_CHV);
> > > >  	if (gtfifodbg) {
> > > >  		DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("GT fifo had a previous error %x\n",
> > > >  				 gtfifodbg);
> > > > @@ -5627,7 +5629,8 @@ static void valleyview_enable_rps(struct drm_device *dev)
> > > >  
> > > >  	valleyview_check_pctx(dev_priv);
> > > >  
> > > > -	if ((gtfifodbg = I915_READ(GTFIFODBG))) {
> > > > +	gtfifodbg = I915_READ(GTFIFODBG);
> > > > +	if (gtfifodbg) {
> > > >  		DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("GT fifo had a previous error %x\n",
> > > >  				 gtfifodbg);
> > > >  		I915_WRITE(GTFIFODBG, gtfifodbg);
> > > > -- 
> > > > 2.7.4
> > > > 
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > > > Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > Daniel Vetter
> > > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> > > http://blog.ffwll.ch
> > 
> > -- 
> > Ville Syrjälä
> > Intel OTC
> 
> -- 
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> http://blog.ffwll.ch

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list