[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm: Paper over locking inversion after registration rework
Daniel Vetter
daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch
Thu Aug 4 16:35:48 UTC 2016
drm_connector_register_all requires a few too many locks because our
connector_list locking is busted. Add another FIXME+hack to work
around this. This should address the below lockdep splat:
======================================================
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
4.7.0-rc5+ #524 Tainted: G O
-------------------------------------------------------
kworker/u8:0/6 is trying to acquire lock:
(&dev->mode_config.mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff815afde0>] drm_modeset_lock_all+0x40/0x120
but task is already holding lock:
((fb_notifier_list).rwsem){++++.+}, at: [<ffffffff810ac195>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x35/0x70
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 ((fb_notifier_list).rwsem){++++.+}:
[<ffffffff810df611>] lock_acquire+0xb1/0x200
[<ffffffff819a55b4>] down_write+0x44/0x80
[<ffffffff810abf91>] blocking_notifier_chain_register+0x21/0xb0
[<ffffffff814c7448>] fb_register_client+0x18/0x20
[<ffffffff814c6c86>] backlight_device_register+0x136/0x260
[<ffffffffa0127eb2>] intel_backlight_device_register+0xa2/0x160 [i915]
[<ffffffffa00f46be>] intel_connector_register+0xe/0x10 [i915]
[<ffffffffa0112bfb>] intel_dp_connector_register+0x1b/0x80 [i915]
[<ffffffff8159dfea>] drm_connector_register+0x4a/0x80
[<ffffffff8159fe44>] drm_connector_register_all+0x64/0xf0
[<ffffffff815a2a64>] drm_modeset_register_all+0x174/0x1c0
[<ffffffff81599b72>] drm_dev_register+0xc2/0xd0
[<ffffffffa00621d7>] i915_driver_load+0x1547/0x2200 [i915]
[<ffffffffa006d80f>] i915_pci_probe+0x4f/0x70 [i915]
[<ffffffff814a2135>] local_pci_probe+0x45/0xa0
[<ffffffff814a349b>] pci_device_probe+0xdb/0x130
[<ffffffff815c07e3>] driver_probe_device+0x223/0x440
[<ffffffff815c0ad5>] __driver_attach+0xd5/0x100
[<ffffffff815be386>] bus_for_each_dev+0x66/0xa0
[<ffffffff815c002e>] driver_attach+0x1e/0x20
[<ffffffff815bf9be>] bus_add_driver+0x1ee/0x280
[<ffffffff815c1810>] driver_register+0x60/0xe0
[<ffffffff814a1a10>] __pci_register_driver+0x60/0x70
[<ffffffffa01a905b>] i915_init+0x5b/0x62 [i915]
[<ffffffff8100042d>] do_one_initcall+0x3d/0x150
[<ffffffff811a935b>] do_init_module+0x5f/0x1d9
[<ffffffff81124416>] load_module+0x20e6/0x27e0
[<ffffffff81124d63>] SYSC_finit_module+0xc3/0xf0
[<ffffffff81124dae>] SyS_finit_module+0xe/0x10
[<ffffffff819a83a9>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1c/0xac
-> #0 (&dev->mode_config.mutex){+.+.+.}:
[<ffffffff810df0ac>] __lock_acquire+0x10fc/0x1260
[<ffffffff810df611>] lock_acquire+0xb1/0x200
[<ffffffff819a3097>] mutex_lock_nested+0x67/0x3c0
[<ffffffff815afde0>] drm_modeset_lock_all+0x40/0x120
[<ffffffff8158f79b>] drm_fb_helper_restore_fbdev_mode_unlocked+0x2b/0x80
[<ffffffff8158f81d>] drm_fb_helper_set_par+0x2d/0x50
[<ffffffffa0105f7a>] intel_fbdev_set_par+0x1a/0x60 [i915]
[<ffffffff814c13c6>] fbcon_init+0x586/0x610
[<ffffffff8154d16a>] visual_init+0xca/0x130
[<ffffffff8154e611>] do_bind_con_driver+0x1c1/0x3a0
[<ffffffff8154eaf6>] do_take_over_console+0x116/0x180
[<ffffffff814bd3a7>] do_fbcon_takeover+0x57/0xb0
[<ffffffff814c1e48>] fbcon_event_notify+0x658/0x750
[<ffffffff810abcae>] notifier_call_chain+0x3e/0xb0
[<ffffffff810ac1ad>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x4d/0x70
[<ffffffff810ac1e6>] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20
[<ffffffff814c748b>] fb_notifier_call_chain+0x1b/0x20
[<ffffffff814c86b1>] register_framebuffer+0x251/0x330
[<ffffffff8158fa9f>] drm_fb_helper_initial_config+0x25f/0x3f0
[<ffffffffa0106b48>] intel_fbdev_initial_config+0x18/0x30 [i915]
[<ffffffff810adfd8>] async_run_entry_fn+0x48/0x150
[<ffffffff810a3947>] process_one_work+0x1e7/0x750
[<ffffffff810a3efb>] worker_thread+0x4b/0x4f0
[<ffffffff810aad4f>] kthread+0xef/0x110
[<ffffffff819a85ef>] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock((fb_notifier_list).rwsem);
lock(&dev->mode_config.mutex);
lock((fb_notifier_list).rwsem);
lock(&dev->mode_config.mutex);
*** DEADLOCK ***
6 locks held by kworker/u8:0/6:
#0: ("events_unbound"){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff810a38c9>] process_one_work+0x169/0x750
#1: ((&entry->work)){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff810a38c9>] process_one_work+0x169/0x750
#2: (registration_lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff814c8487>] register_framebuffer+0x27/0x330
#3: (console_lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff814c86ce>] register_framebuffer+0x26e/0x330
#4: (&fb_info->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff814c78dd>] lock_fb_info+0x1d/0x40
#5: ((fb_notifier_list).rwsem){++++.+}, at: [<ffffffff810ac195>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x35/0x70
stack backtrace:
CPU: 2 PID: 6 Comm: kworker/u8:0 Tainted: G O 4.7.0-rc5+ #524
Hardware name: Intel Corp. Broxton P/NOTEBOOK, BIOS APLKRVPA.X64.0138.B33.1606250842 06/25/2016
Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn
0000000000000000 ffff8800758577f0 ffffffff814507a5 ffffffff828b9900
ffffffff828b9900 ffff880075857830 ffffffff810dc6fa ffff880075857880
ffff88007584d688 0000000000000005 0000000000000006 ffff88007584d6b0
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff814507a5>] dump_stack+0x67/0x92
[<ffffffff810dc6fa>] print_circular_bug+0x1aa/0x200
[<ffffffff810df0ac>] __lock_acquire+0x10fc/0x1260
[<ffffffff810df611>] lock_acquire+0xb1/0x200
[<ffffffff815afde0>] ? drm_modeset_lock_all+0x40/0x120
[<ffffffff815afde0>] ? drm_modeset_lock_all+0x40/0x120
[<ffffffff819a3097>] mutex_lock_nested+0x67/0x3c0
[<ffffffff815afde0>] ? drm_modeset_lock_all+0x40/0x120
[<ffffffff810fa85f>] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x7f/0x90
[<ffffffff81208218>] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x248/0x2b0
[<ffffffff815afdc5>] ? drm_modeset_lock_all+0x25/0x120
[<ffffffff815afde0>] drm_modeset_lock_all+0x40/0x120
[<ffffffff8158f79b>] drm_fb_helper_restore_fbdev_mode_unlocked+0x2b/0x80
[<ffffffff8158f81d>] drm_fb_helper_set_par+0x2d/0x50
[<ffffffffa0105f7a>] intel_fbdev_set_par+0x1a/0x60 [i915]
[<ffffffff814c13c6>] fbcon_init+0x586/0x610
[<ffffffff8154d16a>] visual_init+0xca/0x130
[<ffffffff8154e611>] do_bind_con_driver+0x1c1/0x3a0
[<ffffffff8154eaf6>] do_take_over_console+0x116/0x180
[<ffffffff814bd3a7>] do_fbcon_takeover+0x57/0xb0
[<ffffffff814c1e48>] fbcon_event_notify+0x658/0x750
[<ffffffff810abcae>] notifier_call_chain+0x3e/0xb0
[<ffffffff810ac1ad>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x4d/0x70
[<ffffffff810ac1e6>] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20
[<ffffffff814c748b>] fb_notifier_call_chain+0x1b/0x20
[<ffffffff814c86b1>] register_framebuffer+0x251/0x330
[<ffffffff815b7e8d>] ? vga_switcheroo_client_fb_set+0x5d/0x70
[<ffffffff8158fa9f>] drm_fb_helper_initial_config+0x25f/0x3f0
[<ffffffffa0106b48>] intel_fbdev_initial_config+0x18/0x30 [i915]
[<ffffffff810adfd8>] async_run_entry_fn+0x48/0x150
[<ffffffff810a3947>] process_one_work+0x1e7/0x750
[<ffffffff810a38c9>] ? process_one_work+0x169/0x750
[<ffffffff810a3efb>] worker_thread+0x4b/0x4f0
[<ffffffff810a3eb0>] ? process_one_work+0x750/0x750
[<ffffffff810aad4f>] kthread+0xef/0x110
[<ffffffff819a85ef>] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40
[<ffffffff810aac60>] ? kthread_stop+0x2e0/0x2e0
v2: Rebase onto the right branch (hand-editing patches ftw) and add more
reporters.
Reported-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reported-by: Jiri Kosina <jikos at kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos at kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c | 8 +++-----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
index ef921fa09a84..d9104d8b3c6b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
@@ -401,16 +401,14 @@ int drm_connector_register_all(struct drm_device *dev)
struct drm_connector *connector;
int ret;
- mutex_lock(&dev->mode_config.mutex);
-
- drm_for_each_connector(connector, dev) {
+ /* FIXME: taking the mode config mutex ends up in a clash with
+ * fbcon/backlight registration */
+ list_for_each_entry(connector, &dev->mode_config.connector_list, head) {
ret = drm_connector_register(connector);
if (ret)
goto err;
}
- mutex_unlock(&dev->mode_config.mutex);
-
return 0;
err:
--
2.8.1
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list