[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 12/12] drm/i915: Make sure fb offset is (macro)pixel aligned
Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Wed Aug 10 11:02:43 UTC 2016
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 12:04:32PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 12:23:21PM +0300, ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> >
> > We convert the fb->offsets[] into x/y offsets, so they must be
> > (macro)pixel aligned. Check for this, and if things look good
> > allow fb->offsets[] != 0 when creating fbs since we now handle
> > them correctly.
> >
> > v2: Move to last place in the series and improve the commit message
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> (v1)
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > index f8487bcdb271..d3de56f0e764 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > @@ -15370,6 +15370,37 @@ u32 intel_fb_pitch_limit(struct drm_device *dev, uint64_t fb_modifier,
> > }
> > }
> >
> > +static int intel_fb_check_offsets(const struct drm_mode_fb_cmd2 *mode_cmd)
> > +{
> > + uint32_t format = mode_cmd->pixel_format;
> > + int num_planes = drm_format_num_planes(format);
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < num_planes; i++) {
> > + unsigned int cpp;
> > +
> > + switch (format) {
> > + case DRM_FORMAT_YUYV:
> > + case DRM_FORMAT_UYVY:
> > + case DRM_FORMAT_YVYU:
> > + case DRM_FORMAT_VYUY:
> > + cpp = 4;
> > + break;
> > + default:
> > + cpp = drm_format_plane_cpp(format, i);
>
> I didn't ask for a helper in drm_fourcc.c for macropixel blocksize? Shame
> on me!
You did, long ago. I just couldn't be bothered to go and see what we
need to do there. Now that I do, it doesn't look like we've gained
any new formats that would need special treatment, so I suppose I
could just reuse this guy as is.
> Anyway, looks all good and I didn't spot anything else amiss while
> re-reading the series.
>
> Another wishlist item: Extracting intel_framebuffer.c might be a good
> idea.
> -Daniel
>
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (mode_cmd->offsets[i] % cpp) {
> > + DRM_DEBUG("fb plane %d offset 0x%08x not (macro)pixel aligned\n",
> > + i, mode_cmd->offsets[i]);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > static int intel_framebuffer_init(struct drm_device *dev,
> > struct intel_framebuffer *intel_fb,
> > struct drm_mode_fb_cmd2 *mode_cmd,
> > @@ -15514,9 +15545,9 @@ static int intel_framebuffer_init(struct drm_device *dev,
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > - /* FIXME need to adjust LINOFF/TILEOFF accordingly. */
> > - if (mode_cmd->offsets[0] != 0)
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > + ret = intel_fb_check_offsets(mode_cmd);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> >
> > drm_helper_mode_fill_fb_struct(&intel_fb->base, mode_cmd);
> > intel_fb->obj = obj;
> > --
> > 2.7.4
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> http://blog.ffwll.ch
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list