[Intel-gfx] drm/i915/slpc: If using SLPC, do not set frequency

kbuild test robot lkp at intel.com
Mon Aug 22 10:30:09 UTC 2016


Hi Tom,

[auto build test ERROR on drm-intel/for-linux-next]
[also build test ERROR on v4.8-rc3 next-20160822]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
[Suggest to use git(>=2.9.0) format-patch --base=<commit> (or --base=auto for convenience) to record what (public, well-known) commit your patch series was built on]
[Check https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch for more information]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Sagar-Arun-Kamble/drm-i915-slpc-If-using-SLPC-do-not-set-frequency/20160820-131950
base:   git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel for-linux-next
config: x86_64-rhel-7.2 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-6 (Debian 6.1.1-9) 6.1.1 20160705
reproduce:
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        make ARCH=x86_64 

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c: In function 'intel_set_rps':
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c:4944:6: error: implicit declaration of function 'intel_slpc_active' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     if (intel_slpc_active(dev_priv))
         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors

vim +/intel_slpc_active +4944 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c

  4938		}
  4939		spin_unlock(&dev_priv->rps.client_lock);
  4940	}
  4941	
  4942	void intel_set_rps(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u8 val)
  4943	{
> 4944		if (intel_slpc_active(dev_priv))
  4945			return;
  4946	
  4947		if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv))

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel Corporation
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: .config.gz
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 37664 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20160822/c6dd8a8f/attachment-0001.obj>


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list