[Intel-gfx] [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v1 11/13] tests/sw_sync: Add subtest test_sync_random_merge
Eric Engestrom
eric at engestrom.ch
Tue Aug 23 22:38:43 UTC 2016
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 01:56:13PM -0400, robert.foss at collabora.com wrote:
> From: Robert Foss <robert.foss at collabora.com>
>
> This subtest verifies that creating many timelines and merging random fences
> from each timeline with eachother results in merged fences that are fully
> functional.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss at collabora.com>
> ---
> tests/sw_sync.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 73 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/sw_sync.c b/tests/sw_sync.c
> index 0e67ad5..8e5a7c9 100644
> --- a/tests/sw_sync.c
> +++ b/tests/sw_sync.c
> @@ -383,6 +383,76 @@ static void test_sync_multi_consumer_producer(void)
> igt_assert_f(thread_ret == 0, "A sync thread reported failure.\n");
> }
>
> +static void test_sync_random_merge(void)
> +{
> + int i, size, ret;
> + const int nbr_timeline = 32;
> + const int nbr_merge = 1024;
> + int fence_map[nbr_timeline];
> + int timeline_arr[nbr_timeline];
> + int fence, tmpfence, merged;
> + int timeline, timeline_offset, sync_pt;
> +
> + srand(time(NULL));
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < nbr_timeline; i++)
> + timeline_arr[i] = sw_sync_timeline_create();
> +
> + memset(fence_map, -1, sizeof(fence_map));
This sets each byte to -1, which happens to be the same as an int -1,
but I don't really like it: this is only true for two special values, -1
and 0, and would become a bug if it was ever changed.
I'd much prefer if you simply set:
fence_map[i] = -1;
in the loop you already have just above.
BTW, seeing how many times you set and test for -1 as the "invalid fd
sentinel", how about a:
#define INVALID_FD (-1)
and use that token throughout the code? I think it would improve
readability as well
> +
> + sync_pt = rand();
> + fence = sw_sync_fence_create(timeline_arr[0], sync_pt);
> +
> + fence_map[0] = sync_pt;
> +
> + /* Randomly create syncpoints out of a fixed set of timelines,
> + * and merge them together.
> + */
> + for (i = 0; i < nbr_merge; i++) {
> + /* Generate syncpoint. */
> + timeline_offset = rand() % nbr_timeline;
> + timeline = timeline_arr[timeline_offset];
> + sync_pt = rand();
> +
> + /* Keep track of the latest sync_pt in each timeline. */
> + if (fence_map[timeline_offset] == -1)
> + fence_map[timeline_offset] = sync_pt;
> + else if (fence_map[timeline_offset] < sync_pt)
> + fence_map[timeline_offset] = sync_pt;
> +
> + /* Merge. */
> + tmpfence = sw_sync_fence_create(timeline, sync_pt);
> + merged = sw_sync_merge(tmpfence, fence);
> + sw_sync_fence_destroy(tmpfence);
> + sw_sync_fence_destroy(fence);
> + fence = merged;
> + }
> +
> + size = 0;
> + for (i = 0; i < nbr_timeline; i++)
> + if (fence_map[i] != -1)
> + size++;
> +
> + /* Trigger the merged fence. */
> + for (i = 0; i < nbr_timeline; i++) {
> + if (fence_map[i] != -1) {
> + ret = sw_sync_wait(fence, 0);
> + igt_assert_f(ret == 0,
> + "Failure waiting on fence until timeout\n");
> + /* Increment the timeline to the last sync_pt */
> + sw_sync_timeline_inc(timeline_arr[i], fence_map[i]);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + /* Check that the fence is triggered. */
> + ret = sw_sync_wait(fence, 0);
> + igt_assert_f(ret > 0, "Failure triggering fence\n");
> +
> + sw_sync_fence_destroy(fence);
> + for (i = 0; i < nbr_timeline; i++)
> + sw_sync_timeline_destroy(timeline_arr[i]);
> +}
> +
> igt_main
> {
> igt_subtest("alloc_timeline")
> @@ -411,5 +481,8 @@ igt_main
>
> igt_subtest("sync_multi_consumer_producer")
> test_sync_multi_consumer_producer();
> +
> + igt_subtest("sync_random_merge")
> + test_sync_random_merge();
> }
>
> --
> 2.7.4
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list