[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: fix comment referencing imaginary functions

[Matthew Auld]

The comment which documents the proper usage of the *_FW family of macros makes
reference to intel_uncore_forcewake_irq{unlock, lock}, which is just
confusing, seeing as such a set of functions don't even exist and never have
for that matter(according to git). Let's fix that by replacing them with
intel_uncore_forcewake_{get, put}.

Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld at intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index ff96b7a..c285d61 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -3792,8 +3792,8 @@ __raw_write(64, q)
  * critical sections inside IRQ handlers where forcewake is explicitly
  * controlled.
  * Think twice, and think again, before using these.
- * Note: Should only be used between intel_uncore_forcewake_irqlock() and
- * intel_uncore_forcewake_irqunlock().
+ * Note: Should only be used between intel_uncore_forcewake_get and
+ * intel_uncore_forcewake_put.
  */
 #define I915_READ_FW(reg__) __raw_i915_read32(dev_priv, (reg__))
 #define I915_WRITE_FW(reg__, val__) __raw_i915_write32(dev_priv, (reg__), (val__))
-- 
2.7.4