[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1 00/13] Implement sw_sync test

[Daniel Vetter]

On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 04:41:02PM -0400, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> 2016-08-24 Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch>:
> 
> > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 01:56:02PM -0400, robert.foss at collabora.com wrote:
> > > From: Robert Foss <robert.foss at collabora.com>
> > > 
> > > This series implements the sw_sync test and the lib/sw_sync helper functions
> > > for said test.
> > > 
> > > Gustavo Padovans sw_sync series was just de-staged in
> > > gregkh-staging/staging-next [1], and this test is targeted at verifying the
> > > functionality implemented in that series.
> > > 
> > > The sw_sync subtests range from very basic tests of the sw_sync functionality,
> > > to stress testing and randomized tests.
> > > 
> > > [1] http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging.git/
> > 
> > This seems to be patches against igt (but the series is lacking the i-g-t-
> > subject tag per CONTRIBUTING). I'm ok with that, but I thought the idea
> > was to merge these testcases into the kernel's selftests? Did the plan
> > change?
> 
> We still have the tests for kernel's selftests and the plan is to
> upstream them but I think getting complete tests explicit fencing
> infrastructure in i-g-t is good idea too. We work on more complex tests
> in there and leave kselftest with the basic tests from the initial
> patchset for the sw_sync kselftest.

I'm perfectly happy if i-g-t becomes the canonical location for all things
gfx (kernel) testing. Just wondered whether we have a change of plans here
or not.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch