[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/17] drm/i915: Support explicit fencing for execbuf
Joonas Lahtinen
joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com
Tue Aug 30 09:42:41 UTC 2016
On su, 2016-08-28 at 21:46 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> @@ -1915,6 +1979,16 @@ i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> ret = execbuf_submit(params, args, &eb->vmas);
> err_request:
> __i915_add_request(params->request, ret == 0);
> + if (out_fence) {
> + if (ret == 0) {
> + fd_install(out_fence_fd, out_fence->file);
> + args->rsvd2 &= ~((u64)0xffffffff << 32);
args->rsvd2 &= GENMASK_ULL(0, 31) or at least have some #define for
these. But I'd vote to add real variable names, either by renaming the
variables or by having an anonymous union if you will.
Regardsless;
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com>
Regards, Joonas
--
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list