[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v10 17/21] lib/sw_sync: Add igt_require_sw_sync to enable skipping on no sw_sync support

[Robert Foss]

On 2016-12-07 06:06 AM, Petri Latvala wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 09:52:09PM -0500, Robert Foss wrote:
>> Add igt_require_sw_sync to provide tests to skip if sw_sync support isn't
>> available on the host machine.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss at collabora.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso at collabora.com>
>> ---
>>  lib/sw_sync.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  lib/sw_sync.h |  1 +
>>  2 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/sw_sync.c b/lib/sw_sync.c
>> index a2168f78..d4ecc898 100644
>> --- a/lib/sw_sync.c
>> +++ b/lib/sw_sync.c
>> @@ -194,3 +194,25 @@ int sync_fence_count_status(int fd, int status)
>>  	igt_assert_f(count >= 0, "No fences with supplied status found");
>>  	return count;
>>  }
>> +
>> +static bool kernel_has_sw_sync(void)
>> +{
>> +	bool err;
>> +
>> +	igt_ignore_warn(system("/sbin/modprobe -s r sw_sync"));
>> +
>> +	err = false;
>> +	if (access(DEVFS_SW_SYNC, R_OK | W_OK) < 0) {
>> +		char buf[128];
>> +
>> +		snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%s/sw_sync", igt_debugfs_mount());
>> +		err = access(DEBUGFS_SW_SYNC, R_OK | W_OK) < 0;
>> +	}
>
>
> Did you mean access(buf, R_OK | W_OK) here?

Yes, fixing this in v11.
Thanks!

>
>
> --
> Petri Latvala
>