[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/11] drm/i915: Reorganize overlay filter coeffs into a nicer form

Chris Wilson chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Thu Dec 8 16:26:41 UTC 2016


On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 06:17:28PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 08:45:31AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 07:28:10PM +0200, ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com wrote:
> > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > > 
> > > Use two-dimensional arrays and named initializers to make the
> > > overlay filter coefficient tables easier to parse for humans.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > 
> > Spot checking didn't reveal any typos. I presume that since they are u16
> > array of arrays, gcc is not adding any padding between rows?
> 
> Didn't see any. I suppose we could
> 
> BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(y_static_hcoeffs) != N_PHASES * N_HORIZ_Y_TAPS * 2);
> BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(uv_static_hcoeffs) != N_PHASES * N_HORIZ_UV_TAPS * 2);
> 
> for extra paranoia?

I don't think it matters. Maybe a __packed and just leave it to gcc's
whims?
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list