[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: Move all the DP compliance data to a separate struct

Jani Nikula jani.nikula at linux.intel.com
Fri Dec 9 10:00:10 UTC 2016


On Fri, 09 Dec 2016, Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare at intel.com> wrote:
> This patch does not change anything functionally, just cleans up
> the DP compliance related variables and stores them all together
> in a separate struct intel_dp_compliance. There is another struct
> intel_dp_compliance_data to store all the test data. This makes it easy to
> reset the compliance variables through a memset instead of
> individual resetting.
>
> Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare at intel.com>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwl.ch>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 13 ++++++++-----
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c     | 24 ++++++++++--------------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h    | 14 +++++++++++---
>  3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index a746130..b2ff532 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -4463,9 +4463,9 @@ static ssize_t i915_displayport_test_active_write(struct file *file,
>  			 * testing code, only accept an actual value of 1 here
>  			 */
>  			if (val == 1)
> -				intel_dp->compliance_test_active = 1;
> +				intel_dp->compliance.test_active = 1;
>  			else
> -				intel_dp->compliance_test_active = 0;
> +				intel_dp->compliance.test_active = 0;
>  		}
>  	}
>  out:
> @@ -4492,7 +4492,7 @@ static int i915_displayport_test_active_show(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
>  		if (connector->status == connector_status_connected &&
>  		    connector->encoder != NULL) {
>  			intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(connector->encoder);
> -			if (intel_dp->compliance_test_active)
> +			if (intel_dp->compliance.test_active)
>  				seq_puts(m, "1");
>  			else
>  				seq_puts(m, "0");
> @@ -4536,7 +4536,10 @@ static int i915_displayport_test_data_show(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
>  		if (connector->status == connector_status_connected &&
>  		    connector->encoder != NULL) {
>  			intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(connector->encoder);
> -			seq_printf(m, "%lx", intel_dp->compliance_test_data);
> +			if (intel_dp->compliance.test_type ==
> +			    DP_TEST_LINK_EDID_READ)
> +				seq_printf(m, "%lx",
> +					   intel_dp->compliance.test_data.edid);

The commit message says no functional changes, but this is one. Probably
better to make this change separately.

With that fixed,

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>


>  		} else
>  			seq_puts(m, "0");
>  	}
> @@ -4575,7 +4578,7 @@ static int i915_displayport_test_type_show(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
>  		if (connector->status == connector_status_connected &&
>  		    connector->encoder != NULL) {
>  			intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(connector->encoder);
> -			seq_printf(m, "%02lx", intel_dp->compliance_test_type);
> +			seq_printf(m, "%02lx", intel_dp->compliance.test_type);
>  		} else
>  			seq_puts(m, "0");
>  	}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index db75bb9..c1e107c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -3834,7 +3834,7 @@ static uint8_t intel_dp_autotest_edid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("EDID read had %d NACKs, %d DEFERs\n",
>  				      intel_dp->aux.i2c_nack_count,
>  				      intel_dp->aux.i2c_defer_count);
> -		intel_dp->compliance_test_data = INTEL_DP_RESOLUTION_FAILSAFE;
> +		intel_dp->compliance.test_data.edid = INTEL_DP_RESOLUTION_FAILSAFE;
>  	} else {
>  		struct edid *block = intel_connector->detect_edid;
>  
> @@ -3850,11 +3850,11 @@ static uint8_t intel_dp_autotest_edid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Failed to write EDID checksum\n");
>  
>  		test_result = DP_TEST_ACK | DP_TEST_EDID_CHECKSUM_WRITE;
> -		intel_dp->compliance_test_data = INTEL_DP_RESOLUTION_STANDARD;
> +		intel_dp->compliance.test_data.edid = INTEL_DP_RESOLUTION_STANDARD;
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Set test active flag here so userspace doesn't interrupt things */
> -	intel_dp->compliance_test_active = 1;
> +	intel_dp->compliance.test_active = 1;
>  
>  	return test_result;
>  }
> @@ -3880,22 +3880,22 @@ static void intel_dp_handle_test_request(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  	switch (rxdata) {
>  	case DP_TEST_LINK_TRAINING:
>  		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("LINK_TRAINING test requested\n");
> -		intel_dp->compliance_test_type = DP_TEST_LINK_TRAINING;
> +		intel_dp->compliance.test_type = DP_TEST_LINK_TRAINING;
>  		response = intel_dp_autotest_link_training(intel_dp);
>  		break;
>  	case DP_TEST_LINK_VIDEO_PATTERN:
>  		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("TEST_PATTERN test requested\n");
> -		intel_dp->compliance_test_type = DP_TEST_LINK_VIDEO_PATTERN;
> +		intel_dp->compliance.test_type = DP_TEST_LINK_VIDEO_PATTERN;
>  		response = intel_dp_autotest_video_pattern(intel_dp);
>  		break;
>  	case DP_TEST_LINK_EDID_READ:
>  		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("EDID test requested\n");
> -		intel_dp->compliance_test_type = DP_TEST_LINK_EDID_READ;
> +		intel_dp->compliance.test_type = DP_TEST_LINK_EDID_READ;
>  		response = intel_dp_autotest_edid(intel_dp);
>  		break;
>  	case DP_TEST_LINK_PHY_TEST_PATTERN:
>  		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PHY_PATTERN test requested\n");
> -		intel_dp->compliance_test_type = DP_TEST_LINK_PHY_TEST_PATTERN;
> +		intel_dp->compliance.test_type = DP_TEST_LINK_PHY_TEST_PATTERN;
>  		response = intel_dp_autotest_phy_pattern(intel_dp);
>  		break;
>  	default:
> @@ -4019,7 +4019,7 @@ static void intel_dp_handle_test_request(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  		return;
>  
>  	/* if link training is requested we should perform it always */
> -	if ((intel_dp->compliance_test_type == DP_TEST_LINK_TRAINING) ||
> +	if ((intel_dp->compliance.test_type == DP_TEST_LINK_TRAINING) ||
>  	    (!drm_dp_channel_eq_ok(link_status, intel_dp->lane_count))) {
>  		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("%s: channel EQ not ok, retraining\n",
>  			      intel_encoder->base.name);
> @@ -4053,9 +4053,7 @@ static void intel_dp_handle_test_request(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  	 * Clearing compliance test variables to allow capturing
>  	 * of values for next automated test request.
>  	 */
> -	intel_dp->compliance_test_active = 0;
> -	intel_dp->compliance_test_type = 0;
> -	intel_dp->compliance_test_data = 0;
> +	memset(&intel_dp->compliance, 0, sizeof(intel_dp->compliance));
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Now read the DPCD to see if it's actually running
> @@ -4372,9 +4370,7 @@ static bool intel_digital_port_connected(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  		status = connector_status_disconnected;
>  
>  	if (status == connector_status_disconnected) {
> -		intel_dp->compliance_test_active = 0;
> -		intel_dp->compliance_test_type = 0;
> -		intel_dp->compliance_test_data = 0;
> +		memset(&intel_dp->compliance, 0, sizeof(intel_dp->compliance));
>  
>  		if (intel_dp->is_mst) {
>  			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("MST device may have disappeared %d vs %d\n",
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> index 8f4ddca..f8c7046 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> @@ -884,6 +884,16 @@ struct intel_dp_desc {
>  	u8 sw_minor_rev;
>  } __packed;
>  
> +struct intel_dp_compliance_data {
> +	unsigned long edid;
> +};
> +
> +struct intel_dp_compliance {
> +	unsigned long test_type;
> +	struct intel_dp_compliance_data test_data;
> +	bool test_active;
> +};
> +
>  struct intel_dp {
>  	i915_reg_t output_reg;
>  	i915_reg_t aux_ch_ctl_reg;
> @@ -959,9 +969,7 @@ struct intel_dp {
>  	void (*prepare_link_retrain)(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
>  
>  	/* Displayport compliance testing */
> -	unsigned long compliance_test_type;
> -	unsigned long compliance_test_data;
> -	bool compliance_test_active;
> +	struct intel_dp_compliance compliance;
>  };
>  
>  struct intel_lspcon {

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list