[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] drm: setclientcap doesn't need the drm BKL

[Daniel Vetter]

It only updates per-file feature flags. And all the ioctl which change
behaviour depending upon these flags (they're all kms features) do
_not_ hold the BKL. Therefor this is pure cargo-cult and can be
removed.

Note that there's a risk that the ioctl will behave inconsistently,
but that's ok. The only thing it's not allowed to do is oops the
kernel, and from an audit all places are safe.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c
index 42a17ea5d801..e1b2c372f021 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c
@@ -541,7 +541,7 @@ static const struct drm_ioctl_desc drm_ioctls[] = {
 	DRM_IOCTL_DEF(DRM_IOCTL_GET_CLIENT, drm_getclient, DRM_UNLOCKED),
 	DRM_IOCTL_DEF(DRM_IOCTL_GET_STATS, drm_getstats, DRM_UNLOCKED),
 	DRM_IOCTL_DEF(DRM_IOCTL_GET_CAP, drm_getcap, DRM_UNLOCKED|DRM_RENDER_ALLOW),
-	DRM_IOCTL_DEF(DRM_IOCTL_SET_CLIENT_CAP, drm_setclientcap, 0),
+	DRM_IOCTL_DEF(DRM_IOCTL_SET_CLIENT_CAP, drm_setclientcap, DRM_UNLOCKED),
 	DRM_IOCTL_DEF(DRM_IOCTL_SET_VERSION, drm_setversion, DRM_UNLOCKED | DRM_MASTER),
 
 	DRM_IOCTL_DEF(DRM_IOCTL_SET_UNIQUE, drm_invalid_op, DRM_AUTH|DRM_MASTER|DRM_ROOT_ONLY),
-- 
2.10.2