[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/5] sphinxification for dma-buf docs

[Sumit Semwal]

Hi Daniel,

On 10 December 2016 at 02:45, Jonathan Corbet <corbet at lwn.net> wrote:
> On Fri,  9 Dec 2016 19:53:04 +0100
> Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> wrote:
>
>> Not yet everything in this area, I still want to sprinkle nice docs around all
>> the fence code. Especially some text to explain implicit vs. explicit fencing
>> and how it's all supposed to work.
>>
Thanks for the patch series; I had something in the works too, but you
beat me to it! :)

Looks good to me, so please feel free to add my
Acked-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal at linaro.org>

to the series.

>> But just cleanup in the dma-buf part was quite a bit of work, and I'd like to
>> get feedback on that before moving on.
>
> No complaints here - except that I had to go looking around to find this
> 0/5 posting explaining what the overall goal was...:)
>
> It seems like just the sort of thing we want to be doing to pull the docs
> together in a more rational way.
>
> jon

Best regards,
Sumit.