[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915/guc: Extract param logic form guc_init

[Arkadiusz Hiler]

On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 01:19:18PM -0800, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote:
> 
> 
> On 15/12/16 07:47, Arkadiusz Hiler wrote:
> > Let intel_guc_init() focus on determining and fetching the correct
> > firmware.
> > 
> > This patch introduces intel_sanitize_uc_params() that is called from
> > intel_uc_init().
> > 
> > Then, if we have GuC, we can call intel_guc_init() conditionally and we
> > do not have to do internal checks.
> > 
> > It can be easily extended to support HuC case as well.
> > 
> > Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa at intel.com>
> > Cc: Jeff McGee <jeff.mcgee at intel.com>
> > Cc: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiarski at intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hiler at intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c | 19 +------------------
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c         | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
> > index b76b556..0bb5fd1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
> > @@ -617,7 +617,7 @@ static void guc_fw_fetch(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >  }
> > 
> >  /**
> > - * intel_guc_init() - define parameters and fetch firmware
> > + * intel_guc_init() - determine and fetch firmware
> >   * @dev_priv:	i915 device private
> >   *
> >   * Called early during driver load, but after GEM is initialised.
> > @@ -630,17 +630,6 @@ void intel_guc_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> >  	struct intel_guc_fw *guc_fw = &dev_priv->guc.guc_fw;
> >  	const char *fw_path;
> > 
> > -	if (!HAS_GUC(dev_priv)) {
> > -		i915.enable_guc_loading = 0;
> > -		i915.enable_guc_submission = 0;
> > -	} else {
> > -		/* A negative value means "use platform default" */
> > -		if (i915.enable_guc_loading < 0)
> > -			i915.enable_guc_loading = HAS_GUC_UCODE(dev_priv);
> > -		if (i915.enable_guc_submission < 0)
> > -			i915.enable_guc_submission = HAS_GUC_SCHED(dev_priv);
> > -	}
> > -
> >  	if (!HAS_GUC_UCODE(dev_priv)) {
> >  		fw_path = NULL;
> >  	} else if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv)) {
> > @@ -663,13 +652,7 @@ void intel_guc_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> >  	guc_fw->guc_fw_fetch_status = GUC_FIRMWARE_NONE;
> >  	guc_fw->guc_fw_load_status = GUC_FIRMWARE_NONE;
> > 
> > -	/* can't enable guc submission without guc */
> > -	if (!i915.enable_guc_loading)
> > -		i915.enable_guc_submission = 0;
> > -
> >  	/* Early (and silent) return if GuC loading is disabled */
> > -	if (!i915.enable_guc_loading)
> > -		return;
> >  	if (fw_path == NULL)
> >  		return;
> >  	if (*fw_path == '\0')
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
> > index 4e184edb..e72f784 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
> > @@ -25,6 +25,24 @@
> >  #include "i915_drv.h"
> >  #include "intel_uc.h"
> > 
> > +static void intel_sanitize_uc_params(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > +{
> > +	if (!HAS_GUC(dev_priv)) {
> > +		i915.enable_guc_loading = 0;
> > +		i915.enable_guc_submission = 0;
> > +	} else {
> > +		/* A negative value means "use platform default" */
> > +		if (i915.enable_guc_loading < 0)
> > +			i915.enable_guc_loading = HAS_GUC_UCODE(dev_priv);
> > +		if (i915.enable_guc_submission < 0)
> > +			i915.enable_guc_submission = HAS_GUC_SCHED(dev_priv);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	/* can't enable guc submission without guc */
> > +	if (!i915.enable_guc_loading)
> > +		i915.enable_guc_submission = 0;
> > +}
> > +
> >  void intel_uc_init_early(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> >  {
> >  	mutex_init(&dev_priv->guc.send_mutex);
> > @@ -32,7 +50,10 @@ void intel_uc_init_early(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > 
> >  void intel_uc_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> >  {
> > -	intel_guc_init(dev_priv);
> > +	intel_sanitize_uc_params(dev_priv);
> 
> If we place intel_sanitize_uc_params in intel_sanitize_options we can have
> the parameters resolved earlier and we should therefore be able to use them
> to better handle GuC-related differences during driver load.
> 
> Daniele

Agree. I haven't noticed the intel_sanitize_options().

> 
> > +
> > +	if (i915.enable_guc_loading)
> > +		intel_guc_init(dev_priv);
> >  }
> > 
> >  int intel_uc_load(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > 

-- 
Cheers,
Arek