[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/12] drm/i915: Do not wait atomically for display clocks
Tvrtko Ursulin
tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Tue Feb 2 11:06:20 UTC 2016
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
Looks like this code does not need to wait atomically since it
otherwise takes the mutex.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index 304fc9637026..a7530cf612d7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -9753,8 +9753,8 @@ static void broadwell_set_cdclk(struct drm_device *dev, int cdclk)
val |= LCPLL_CD_SOURCE_FCLK;
I915_WRITE(LCPLL_CTL, val);
- if (wait_for_atomic_us(I915_READ(LCPLL_CTL) &
- LCPLL_CD_SOURCE_FCLK_DONE, 1))
+ if (wait_for_us(I915_READ(LCPLL_CTL) &
+ LCPLL_CD_SOURCE_FCLK_DONE, 1))
DRM_ERROR("Switching to FCLK failed\n");
val = I915_READ(LCPLL_CTL);
@@ -9788,8 +9788,8 @@ static void broadwell_set_cdclk(struct drm_device *dev, int cdclk)
val &= ~LCPLL_CD_SOURCE_FCLK;
I915_WRITE(LCPLL_CTL, val);
- if (wait_for_atomic_us((I915_READ(LCPLL_CTL) &
- LCPLL_CD_SOURCE_FCLK_DONE) == 0, 1))
+ if (wait_for_us((I915_READ(LCPLL_CTL) &
+ LCPLL_CD_SOURCE_FCLK_DONE) == 0, 1))
DRM_ERROR("Switching back to LCPLL failed\n");
mutex_lock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
--
1.9.1
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list