[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/dsi: skip gpio element execution when not supported
Jani Nikula
jani.nikula at intel.com
Thu Feb 4 17:12:59 UTC 2016
On Thu, 04 Feb 2016, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Feb 2016, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 06:52:47PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>>> Skip v3 gpio element because the support is not there, and skip gpio
>>> element on non-vlv because the sideband code is vlv specific.
>>>
>>> v2: the gpio stuff is currently only supported on vlv (Ville)
>>>
>>> Cc: drm-intel-fixes at lists.freedesktop.org
>>> Fixes: 2a33d93486f2 ("drm/i915/bios: add support for MIPI sequence block v3")
>>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_panel_vbt.c | 13 +++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_panel_vbt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_panel_vbt.c
>>> index f4d303ee538b..bcc083db7632 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_panel_vbt.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_panel_vbt.c
>>> @@ -205,6 +205,9 @@ static const u8 *mipi_exec_gpio(struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi, const u8 *data)
>>> struct drm_device *dev = intel_dsi->base.base.dev;
>>> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>>>
>>> + if (dev_priv->vbt.dsi.seq_version >= 3)
>>> + data++;
>>> +
>>
>> So here we handle v3
>>
>>> gpio = *data++;
>>>
>>> /* pull up/down */
>>> @@ -215,6 +218,16 @@ static const u8 *mipi_exec_gpio(struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi, const u8 *data)
>>> goto out;
>>> }
>>>
>>> + if (!IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv)) {
>>> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("GPIO element not supported on this platform\n");
>>> + goto out;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + if (dev_priv->vbt.dsi.seq_version >= 3) {
>>> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("GPIO element v3 not supported\n");
>>> + goto out;
>>> + }
>>
>> but here we say it's not supported. Is there more missing?
>
> The whole point of doing it this way is to support *skipping* v3 in a
> graceful manner. If I bailed out at the top, I'd have to duplicate the
> knowledge about the length of the element.
Oh, and I want to split the v3 support like this to allow backporting
*this* patch for fixes, while the actual support goes through dinq.
>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
>
>>
>>> +
>>> function = gtable[gpio].function_reg;
>>> pad = gtable[gpio].pad_reg;
>>>
>>> --
>>> 2.1.4
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Intel-gfx mailing list
>>> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list