[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 10/11] drm/i915: interchange context/engine cleanup order

[Dave Gordon]

From: Nick Hoath <nicholas.hoath at intel.com>

Swap the order of context & engine cleanup, so that contexts are cleaned
up first, and *then* engines. This is a more sensible order anyway, but
in particular has become necessary since the 'intel_ring_initialized()
must be simple and inline' patch, which now uses ring->dev as an
'initialised' flag, so it can now be NULL after engine teardown. This in
turn can cause a problem in the context code, which (used to) check the
ring->dev->struct_mutex -- causing a fault if ring->dev was NULL.

Signed-off-by: Nick Hoath <nicholas.hoath at intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gordon <david.s.gordon at intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon at intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
index 5d95c80..57afec8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
@@ -444,8 +444,8 @@ static int i915_load_modeset_init(struct drm_device *dev)
 
 cleanup_gem:
 	mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
-	i915_gem_cleanup_engines(dev);
 	i915_gem_context_fini(dev);
+	i915_gem_cleanup_engines(dev);
 	mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
 cleanup_irq:
 	intel_guc_ucode_fini(dev);
@@ -1253,8 +1253,8 @@ int i915_driver_unload(struct drm_device *dev)
 
 	intel_guc_ucode_fini(dev);
 	mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
-	i915_gem_cleanup_engines(dev);
 	i915_gem_context_fini(dev);
+	i915_gem_cleanup_engines(dev);
 	mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
 	intel_fbc_cleanup_cfb(dev_priv);
 
-- 
1.9.1