[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/BXT: Configure DSI after enabling DSI pll

Daniel Vetter daniel at ffwll.ch
Mon Feb 15 16:18:17 UTC 2016


On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 02:59:11PM +0200, Mika Kahola wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 11:28 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > On Tue, 02 Feb 2016, Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c at intel.com> wrote:
> > > We need to enable DSI PLL before configuring the DSI registers.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c at intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c |    2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
> > > index 91cef35..378f879 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
> > > @@ -478,8 +478,8 @@ static void intel_dsi_pre_enable(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> > >  
> > >  	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("\n");
> > >  
> > > -	intel_dsi_prepare(encoder);
> > >  	intel_enable_dsi_pll(encoder);
> > > +	intel_dsi_prepare(encoder);
> > 
> > I'd really like to have this tested on BYT/CHV DSI to ensure we're not
> > breaking anything.
> > 
> > BR,
> > Jani.
> > 
> We have CI results for this. Should we be worried about CPU fifo
> underrun?
> 
> http://benchsrv.fi.intel.com/archive/results/CI_IGT_test/Patchwork_1344/

Known issue on ilk: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93787

Cheers, Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list