[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm: Use a normal idr allocation for the obj->name

Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Mon Jan 4 07:31:14 PST 2016


On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 10:11:01AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Unlike the handle, the name table uses a sleeping mutex rather than a
> spinlock. The allocation is in a normal context, and we can use the
> simpler sleeping gfp_t, rather than have to take from the atomic
> reserves.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>

Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c | 4 +---
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
> index ad955d7c99fd..1b0c2c127072 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
> @@ -642,7 +642,6 @@ drm_gem_flink_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>  		return -ENOENT;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&dev->object_name_lock);
> -	idr_preload(GFP_KERNEL);
>  	/* prevent races with concurrent gem_close. */
>  	if (obj->handle_count == 0) {
>  		ret = -ENOENT;
> @@ -650,7 +649,7 @@ drm_gem_flink_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>  	}
>  
>  	if (!obj->name) {
> -		ret = idr_alloc(&dev->object_name_idr, obj, 1, 0, GFP_NOWAIT);
> +		ret = idr_alloc(&dev->object_name_idr, obj, 1, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
>  		if (ret < 0)
>  			goto err;
>  
> @@ -661,7 +660,6 @@ drm_gem_flink_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>  	ret = 0;
>  
>  err:
> -	idr_preload_end();
>  	mutex_unlock(&dev->object_name_lock);
>  	drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked(obj);
>  	return ret;
> -- 
> 2.6.4
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list