[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: edp resume/On time optimization.
Kumar, Abhay
abhay.kumar at intel.com
Mon Jan 4 17:30:53 PST 2016
Make resume/on codepath not to wait for panel_power_cycle_delay(t11_t12) if this time is already spent in suspend/poweron time.
v2: Use CLOCK_BOOTTIME and remove jiffies for panel power cycle
delay calculation(Ville).
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Abhay Kumar <abhay.kumar at intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 3 +++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 22 ++++++++++++++-------- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 2 +-
3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
index e6408e5..480697d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
@@ -2395,6 +2395,9 @@ static void intel_ddi_post_disable(struct intel_encoder *intel_encoder)
intel_dp_sink_dpms(intel_dp, DRM_MODE_DPMS_OFF);
intel_edp_panel_vdd_on(intel_dp);
intel_edp_panel_off(intel_dp);
+
+ /* storing panel power off time */
+ intel_dp->panel_power_off_time = ktime_get_with_offset(TK_OFFS_BOOT);
}
if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev) || IS_KABYLAKE(dev)) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c index 796e3d3..c813605 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
@@ -38,7 +38,6 @@
#include "intel_drv.h"
#include <drm/i915_drm.h>
#include "i915_drv.h"
-
#define DP_LINK_CHECK_TIMEOUT (10 * 1000)
/* Compliance test status bits */
@@ -1812,13 +1811,22 @@ static void wait_panel_off(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
static void wait_panel_power_cycle(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) {
+ ktime_t panel_power_on_time;
+ u32 panel_power_off_duration;
+
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Wait for panel power cycle\n");
- /* When we disable the VDD override bit last we have to do the manual
- * wait. */
- wait_remaining_ms_from_jiffies(intel_dp->last_power_cycle,
- intel_dp->panel_power_cycle_delay);
+ /* take the diffrence of currrent time and panel power off time
+ and then make panel wait for t11_t12 if needed */
+ panel_power_on_time = ktime_get_with_offset(TK_OFFS_BOOT);
+ panel_power_off_duration = (panel_power_on_time.tv64 - intel_dp->panel_power_off_time.tv64);
+ panel_power_off_duration = panel_power_off_duration / 1000000;
+ /* When we disable the VDD override bit last we have to do the manual
+ * wait */
+ if (panel_power_off_duration < intel_dp->panel_power_cycle_delay)
+ wait_remaining_ms_from_jiffies(jiffies,
+ (intel_dp->panel_power_cycle_delay -
+panel_power_off_duration));
wait_panel_status(intel_dp, IDLE_CYCLE_MASK, IDLE_CYCLE_VALUE); }
@@ -1969,7 +1977,7 @@ static void edp_panel_vdd_off_sync(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
I915_READ(pp_stat_reg), I915_READ(pp_ctrl_reg));
if ((pp & POWER_TARGET_ON) == 0)
- intel_dp->last_power_cycle = jiffies;
+ intel_dp->panel_power_off_time = ktime_get_with_offset(TK_OFFS_BOOT);
power_domain = intel_display_port_aux_power_domain(intel_encoder);
intel_display_power_put(dev_priv, power_domain); @@ -2118,7 +2126,6 @@ static void edp_panel_off(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
I915_WRITE(pp_ctrl_reg, pp);
POSTING_READ(pp_ctrl_reg);
- intel_dp->last_power_cycle = jiffies;
wait_panel_off(intel_dp);
/* We got a reference when we enabled the VDD. */ @@ -5122,7 +5129,6 @@ intel_dp_add_properties(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, struct drm_connector *connect
static void intel_dp_init_panel_power_timestamps(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) {
- intel_dp->last_power_cycle = jiffies;
intel_dp->last_power_on = jiffies;
intel_dp->last_backlight_off = jiffies; } diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
index d523ebb..84ad134 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
@@ -765,9 +765,9 @@ struct intel_dp {
int backlight_off_delay;
struct delayed_work panel_vdd_work;
bool want_panel_vdd;
- unsigned long last_power_cycle;
unsigned long last_power_on;
unsigned long last_backlight_off;
+ ktime_t panel_power_off_time;
struct notifier_block edp_notifier;
Ville,
Is this patch is coming close to what you wanted?
Regards,
Abhay Kumar
--
1.9.1
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list