[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Init power domains early in driver load

Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Thu Jan 7 06:32:56 PST 2016


On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 02:51:05PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Since
> 
> commit ac9b8236551d1177fd07b56aef9b565d1864420d
> Author: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> Date:   Fri Nov 27 18:55:26 2015 +0200
> 
>     drm/i915: Introduce a gmbus power domain
> 
> gmbus also needs the power domain infrastructure right from the start,
> since as soon as we register the i2c controllers someone can use them.
> 
> v2: Adjust cleanup paths too (Chris).
> 
> v3: Rebase onto -nightly (totally bogus tree I had lying around) and
> also move dpio init head (Ville).
> 
> v4: Ville instead suggested to move gmbus setup later in the sequence,
> since it's only needed by the modeset code.
> 
> v5: Move even close to the actual user, right next to the comment that
> states where we really need gmbus (and interrupts!).
> 
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.jakobsson at linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
> Cc: Meelis Roos <mroos at linux.ee>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Fixes: ac9b8236551d ("drm/i915: Introduce a gmbus power domain")
> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
> References: http://www.spinics.net/lists/intel-gfx/msg83075.html
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com>
> ---
> 
> Meelis, can you pls retest this one?
> 
> Thanks, Daniel
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c      | 6 +++---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 2 ++
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
> index 988a3806512a..d70d96fe553b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
> @@ -406,6 +406,8 @@ static int i915_load_modeset_init(struct drm_device *dev)
>  	if (ret)
>  		goto cleanup_gem_stolen;
>  
> +	intel_setup_gmbus(dev);
> +
>  	/* Important: The output setup functions called by modeset_init need
>  	 * working irqs for e.g. gmbus and dp aux transfers. */
>  	intel_modeset_init(dev);
> @@ -455,6 +457,7 @@ cleanup_gem:
>  cleanup_irq:
>  	intel_guc_ucode_fini(dev);
>  	drm_irq_uninstall(dev);
> +	intel_teardown_gmbus(dev);
>  cleanup_gem_stolen:
>  	i915_gem_cleanup_stolen(dev);
>  cleanup_vga_switcheroo:
> @@ -1028,7 +1031,6 @@ int i915_driver_load(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned long flags)
>  
>  	/* Try to make sure MCHBAR is enabled before poking at it */
>  	intel_setup_mchbar(dev);
> -	intel_setup_gmbus(dev);
>  	intel_opregion_setup(dev);
>  
>  	i915_gem_load(dev);
> @@ -1101,7 +1103,6 @@ out_gem_unload:
>  	if (dev->pdev->msi_enabled)
>  		pci_disable_msi(dev->pdev);
>  
> -	intel_teardown_gmbus(dev);
>  	intel_teardown_mchbar(dev);
>  	pm_qos_remove_request(&dev_priv->pm_qos);
>  	destroy_workqueue(dev_priv->gpu_error.hangcheck_wq);
> @@ -1203,7 +1204,6 @@ int i915_driver_unload(struct drm_device *dev)
>  
>  	intel_csr_ucode_fini(dev_priv);
>  
> -	intel_teardown_gmbus(dev);
>  	intel_teardown_mchbar(dev);
>  
>  	destroy_workqueue(dev_priv->hotplug.dp_wq);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 37945ddb4dad..ac0038bf4fbf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -15971,6 +15971,8 @@ void intel_modeset_cleanup(struct drm_device *dev)
>  	mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
>  	intel_cleanup_gt_powersave(dev);
>  	mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> +
> +	intel_teardown_gmbus(dev);

The cleanup path is where things might still be a bit wonky. Should we be
doing this before turning off the interrupts? But then that might mean
that the hpd cleanup needs to be rehashed somewhat to make sure we shut
down hpd before unregistering gmbus. The whole init/cleanup sequence is
a bit of a mess tbh, so a major overhaul might be required to make it
actually sane.

In any case, I'm thinking this is at least no worse that what we had, so 
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>

>  }
>  
>  /*
> -- 
> 2.6.4

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list