[Intel-gfx] ✗ failure: Fi.CI.BAT

Daniel Vetter daniel at ffwll.ch
Thu Jan 7 06:36:46 PST 2016


On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 03:06:13PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Jan 2016, Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon at intel.com> wrote:
> > On 06/01/16 10:20, Patchwork wrote:
> >> == Summary ==
> >>
> >> Built on 24b053acb16b4b3b021575e4ee30ffedd3ab2920 drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-01m-06d-08h-16m-11s UTC integration manifest
> >>
> >> Test drv_getparams_basic:
> >>          Subgroup basic-eu-total:
> >>                  pass       -> DMESG-FAIL (skl-i5k-2)
> >>                  pass       -> DMESG-FAIL (skl-i7k-2)
> 
> [snip]
> 
> >>
> >> bdw-nuci7        total:132  pass:122  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:9
> >> bdw-ultra        total:132  pass:126  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:6
> >> bsw-nuc-2        total:135  pass:115  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:20
> >> byt-nuc          total:135  pass:121  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:13
> >> hsw-brixbox      total:135  pass:128  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:7
> >> hsw-gt2          total:135  pass:131  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:4
> >> ilk-hp8440p      total:135  pass:100  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:35
> >> ivb-t430s        total:135  pass:129  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:6
> >> skl-i5k-2        total:135  pass:2    dwarn:0   dfail:132 fail:0   skip:1
> >> skl-i7k-2        total:135  pass:2    dwarn:0   dfail:132 fail:0   skip:1
> >> snb-dellxps      total:135  pass:123  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:12
> >> snb-x220t        total:135  pass:123  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:1   skip:11
> >>
> >> Results at /archive/results/CI_IGT_test/Patchwork_1094/
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Intel-gfx mailing list
> >> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> >> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> >
> > Looks like the CI SKL doesn't have the GuC firmware installed?
> 
> It's tons of:
> 
> [   38.169461] [drm:intel_lr_context_deferred_alloc [i915]] *ERROR* ring create req: -5
> 
> If that gets fixed by installing the GuC firmware, the answer is *not*
> to install the GuC firmware on the CI machines. The answer is to make
> the driver handle missing firmware gracefully.

I kinda don't want to support 2 different ways to run things on any given
platform, because we can't even support one way properly.

But since it took forever to get guc enabled people will indeed scream if
guc isn't there, so either we enable this only for bxt and later or we
indeed need to support both cases on skl :(

Either way we do need to install guc firmware first on CI boxes, since
otherwise coverage isn't there.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list