[Intel-gfx] ✗ failure: Fi.CI.BAT

[Dave Gordon]

On 07/01/16 14:36, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 03:06:13PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Thu, 07 Jan 2016, Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon at intel.com> wrote:
>>> On 06/01/16 10:20, Patchwork wrote:
>>>> == Summary ==
>>>>
>>>> Built on 24b053acb16b4b3b021575e4ee30ffedd3ab2920 drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-01m-06d-08h-16m-11s UTC integration manifest
>>>>
>>>> Test drv_getparams_basic:
>>>>           Subgroup basic-eu-total:
>>>>                   pass       -> DMESG-FAIL (skl-i5k-2)
>>>>                   pass       -> DMESG-FAIL (skl-i7k-2)
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>>>
>>>> bdw-nuci7        total:132  pass:122  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:9
>>>> bdw-ultra        total:132  pass:126  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:6
>>>> bsw-nuc-2        total:135  pass:115  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:20
>>>> byt-nuc          total:135  pass:121  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:13
>>>> hsw-brixbox      total:135  pass:128  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:7
>>>> hsw-gt2          total:135  pass:131  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:4
>>>> ilk-hp8440p      total:135  pass:100  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:35
>>>> ivb-t430s        total:135  pass:129  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:6
>>>> skl-i5k-2        total:135  pass:2    dwarn:0   dfail:132 fail:0   skip:1
>>>> skl-i7k-2        total:135  pass:2    dwarn:0   dfail:132 fail:0   skip:1
>>>> snb-dellxps      total:135  pass:123  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:12
>>>> snb-x220t        total:135  pass:123  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:1   skip:11
>>>>
>>>> Results at /archive/results/CI_IGT_test/Patchwork_1094/
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Intel-gfx mailing list
>>>> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>>>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>>>
>>> Looks like the CI SKL doesn't have the GuC firmware installed?
>>
>> It's tons of:
>>
>> [   38.169461] [drm:intel_lr_context_deferred_alloc [i915]] *ERROR* ring create req: -5
>>
>> If that gets fixed by installing the GuC firmware, the answer is *not*
>> to install the GuC firmware on the CI machines. The answer is to make
>> the driver handle missing firmware gracefully.
>
> I kinda don't want to support 2 different ways to run things on any given
> platform, because we can't even support one way properly.
>
> But since it took forever to get guc enabled people will indeed scream if
> guc isn't there, so either we enable this only for bxt and later or we
> indeed need to support both cases on skl :(

Yeah, we used to have that ability, until it was vetoed :(
See <20150706142822.GJ2156 at phenom.ffwll.local> or
http://www.mail-archive.com/intel-gfx%40lists.freedesktop.org/msg63553.html

> Either way we do need to install guc firmware first on CI boxes, since
> otherwise coverage isn't there.
> -Daniel