[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/13] drm/i915: GEM operations need to be done under the big lock

[Tvrtko Ursulin]

From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>

VMA creation and GEM list management need the big lock.

v2:

Mutex unlock ended on the wrong path somehow. (0-day, Julia Lawall)

Not to mention drm_gem_object_unreference was there in existing
code with no mutex held.

Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c
index c384dc9c8a63..7c2f9127bb23 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c
@@ -670,6 +670,8 @@ i915_gem_object_create_stolen_for_preallocated(struct drm_device *dev,
 	if (gtt_offset == I915_GTT_OFFSET_NONE)
 		return obj;
 
+	mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
+
 	vma = i915_gem_obj_lookup_or_create_vma(obj, ggtt);
 	if (IS_ERR(vma)) {
 		ret = PTR_ERR(vma);
@@ -698,9 +700,12 @@ i915_gem_object_create_stolen_for_preallocated(struct drm_device *dev,
 	list_add_tail(&obj->global_list, &dev_priv->mm.bound_list);
 	i915_gem_object_pin_pages(obj);
 
+	mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
+
 	return obj;
 
 err:
 	drm_gem_object_unreference(&obj->base);
+	mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
 	return NULL;
 }
-- 
1.9.1