[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 023/190] drm/i915: Only apply one barrier after a breadcrumb interrupt is posted

[Chris Wilson]

If we flag the seqno as potentially stale upon receiving an interrupt,
we can use that information to reduce the frequency that we apply the
heavyweight coherent seqno read (i.e. if we wake up a chain of waiters).

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h          | 15 ++++++++++++++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c          |  1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c |  8 ++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h  |  1 +
 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index c2ee8efdd928..8940b8d3fa59 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -3649,7 +3649,20 @@ static inline bool __i915_request_irq_complete(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req)
 	 * but it is easier and safer to do it every time the waiter
 	 * is woken.
 	 */
-	if (engine->irq_seqno_barrier) {
+	if (engine->irq_seqno_barrier && READ_ONCE(engine->irq_posted)) {
+		/* The ordering of irq_posted versus applying the barrier
+		 * is crucial. The clearing of the current irq_posted must
+		 * be visible before we perform the barrier operation,
+		 * such that if a subsequent interrupt arrives, irq_posted
+		 * is reasserted and our task rewoken (which causes us to
+		 * do another __i915_request_irq_complete() immediately
+		 * and reapply the barrier). Conversely, if the clear
+		 * occurs after the barrier, then an interrupt that arrived
+		 * whilst we waited on the barrier would not trigger a
+		 * barrier on the next pass, and the read may not see the
+		 * seqno update.
+		 */
+		WRITE_ONCE(engine->irq_posted, false);
 		engine->irq_seqno_barrier(engine);
 		if (i915_gem_request_completed(req))
 			return true;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
index 627c7fb6aa9b..738edd7fbf8d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
@@ -1000,6 +1000,7 @@ static void notify_ring(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
 		return;
 
 	trace_i915_gem_request_notify(ring);
+	ring->irq_posted = true; /* paired with mb() in wake_up_process() */
 	intel_engine_wakeup(ring);
 }
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
index f66acf820c40..d689bd61534e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
@@ -43,12 +43,20 @@ static void intel_breadcrumbs_fake_irq(unsigned long data)
 
 static void irq_enable(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 {
+	/* Enabling the IRQ may miss the generation of the interrupt, but
+	 * we still need to force the barrier before reading the seqno,
+	 * just in case.
+	 */
+	engine->irq_posted = true;
+
 	WARN_ON(!engine->irq_get(engine));
 }
 
 static void irq_disable(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 {
 	engine->irq_put(engine);
+
+	engine->irq_posted = false;
 }
 
 static bool __intel_breadcrumbs_enable_irq(struct intel_breadcrumbs *b)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
index 28ab07b38c05..6cc8e9c5f8d6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
@@ -198,6 +198,7 @@ struct  intel_engine_cs {
 	struct i915_ctx_workarounds wa_ctx;
 
 	unsigned irq_refcount; /* protected by dev_priv->irq_lock */
+	bool		irq_posted;
 	u32		irq_enable_mask;	/* bitmask to enable ring interrupt */
 	struct drm_i915_gem_request *trace_irq_req;
 	bool __must_check (*irq_get)(struct intel_engine_cs *ring);
-- 
2.7.0.rc3