[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 073/190] drm/i915: Introduce i915_gem_active for request tracking

Chris Wilson chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Tue Jan 12 03:01:36 PST 2016

On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:04:20AM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> Perhaps then leave the structure name as is and just rename the
> function to i915_gem_request_assign_active? I think that describes
> better what is actually happening.


request_assign_active() says to me that it is the request we are acting
on and it can have only one active entity. "update" could go either way.

i915_gem_active_add_to_request() is the full version I guess, or just

i915_gem_request_mark_active() -> i915_gem_active_set()

Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre

More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list