[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/guc: Fix a memory leak where guc->execbuf_client is not freed

[yu.dai at intel.com]

From: Alex Dai <yu.dai at intel.com>

During driver unloading, the guc_client created for command submission
needs to be released to avoid memory leak.

The struct_mutex needs to be held before tearing down GuC.

v1: Move i915_guc_submission_disable out of i915_guc_submission_fini and
    take struct_mutex lock before release GuC client. (Dave Gordon)
v2: Add the locking for failure case in guc_fw_fetch. (Dave Gordon)
    Add i915_guc_submission_fini for failure case in intel_guc_ucode_load.

Signed-off-by: Alex Dai <yu.dai at intel.com>

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
index d20788f..3accd91 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
@@ -445,6 +445,7 @@ fail:
 
 	direct_interrupts_to_host(dev_priv);
 	i915_guc_submission_disable(dev);
+	i915_guc_submission_fini(dev);
 
 	return err;
 }
@@ -561,10 +562,12 @@ fail:
 	DRM_ERROR("Failed to fetch GuC firmware from %s (error %d)\n",
 		  guc_fw->guc_fw_path, err);
 
+	mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
 	obj = guc_fw->guc_fw_obj;
 	if (obj)
 		drm_gem_object_unreference(&obj->base);
 	guc_fw->guc_fw_obj = NULL;
+	mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
 
 	release_firmware(fw);		/* OK even if fw is NULL */
 	guc_fw->guc_fw_fetch_status = GUC_FIRMWARE_FAIL;
@@ -631,10 +634,11 @@ void intel_guc_ucode_fini(struct drm_device *dev)
 	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
 	struct intel_guc_fw *guc_fw = &dev_priv->guc.guc_fw;
 
+	mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
 	direct_interrupts_to_host(dev_priv);
+	i915_guc_submission_disable(dev);
 	i915_guc_submission_fini(dev);
 
-	mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
 	if (guc_fw->guc_fw_obj)
 		drm_gem_object_unreference(&guc_fw->guc_fw_obj->base);
 	guc_fw->guc_fw_obj = NULL;
-- 
2.5.0