[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Move load time stolen memory init earlier

Imre Deak imre.deak at intel.com
Tue Jan 19 08:22:21 PST 2016


On ti, 2016-01-19 at 13:49 +0000, Patchwork wrote:
> == Summary ==
> 
> Built on 00a0c7d1ae09b1259c7af8e5a088b0b225d805df drm-intel-nightly:
> 2016y-01m-18d-16h-50m-37s UTC integration manifest
> 
> Test gem_ctx_basic:
>                 pass       -> FAIL       (bdw-ultra)

Couldn't reproduce it on the same machine. To me it looks unrelated as
it happened already several times for other patches, always on the same
machine. These BAT results are not shown on the test's "long term"
history btw. I filed a bug: 
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93776

> Test kms_flip:
>         Subgroup basic-flip-vs-dpms:
>                 dmesg-warn -> PASS       (skl-i5k-2)
> Test pm_rpm:
>         Subgroup basic-rte:
>                 dmesg-warn -> PASS       (byt-nuc) UNSTABLE
> 
> bdw-
> nuci7        total:140  pass:131  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:9
>   
> bdw-
> ultra        total:140  pass:132  dwarn:0   dfail:1   fail:1   skip:6
>   
> byt-
> nuc          total:143  pass:126  dwarn:2   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:1
> 5 
> hsw-
> brixbox      total:143  pass:136  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:7
>   
> hsw-
> gt2          total:143  pass:139  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:4
>   
> ilk-
> hp8440p      total:143  pass:102  dwarn:3   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:3
> 8 
> ivb-
> t430s        total:137  pass:124  dwarn:3   dfail:4   fail:0   skip:6
>   
> skl-i5k-
> 2        total:143  pass:134  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:8  
> snb-
> dellxps      total:143  pass:124  dwarn:5   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:1
> 4 
> snb-
> x220t        total:143  pass:124  dwarn:5   dfail:0   fail:1   skip:1
> 3 
> 
> Results at /archive/results/CI_IGT_test/Patchwork_1220/
> 


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list