[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Move load time stolen memory init earlier
Imre Deak
imre.deak at intel.com
Tue Jan 19 08:22:21 PST 2016
On ti, 2016-01-19 at 13:49 +0000, Patchwork wrote:
> == Summary ==
>
> Built on 00a0c7d1ae09b1259c7af8e5a088b0b225d805df drm-intel-nightly:
> 2016y-01m-18d-16h-50m-37s UTC integration manifest
>
> Test gem_ctx_basic:
> pass -> FAIL (bdw-ultra)
Couldn't reproduce it on the same machine. To me it looks unrelated as
it happened already several times for other patches, always on the same
machine. These BAT results are not shown on the test's "long term"
history btw. I filed a bug:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93776
> Test kms_flip:
> Subgroup basic-flip-vs-dpms:
> dmesg-warn -> PASS (skl-i5k-2)
> Test pm_rpm:
> Subgroup basic-rte:
> dmesg-warn -> PASS (byt-nuc) UNSTABLE
>
> bdw-
> nuci7 total:140 pass:131 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:9
>
> bdw-
> ultra total:140 pass:132 dwarn:0 dfail:1 fail:1 skip:6
>
> byt-
> nuc total:143 pass:126 dwarn:2 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:1
> 5
> hsw-
> brixbox total:143 pass:136 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:7
>
> hsw-
> gt2 total:143 pass:139 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:4
>
> ilk-
> hp8440p total:143 pass:102 dwarn:3 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:3
> 8
> ivb-
> t430s total:137 pass:124 dwarn:3 dfail:4 fail:0 skip:6
>
> skl-i5k-
> 2 total:143 pass:134 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:8
> snb-
> dellxps total:143 pass:124 dwarn:5 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:1
> 4
> snb-
> x220t total:143 pass:124 dwarn:5 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:1
> 3
>
> Results at /archive/results/CI_IGT_test/Patchwork_1220/
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list