[Intel-gfx] [RFC 6/9] drm/i915: Add sync framework support to execbuff IOCTL
maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com
Thu Jan 21 06:47:40 PST 2016
Op 14-01-16 om 13:07 schreef Chris Wilson:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:47:17AM +0000, John Harrison wrote:
>> On 13/01/2016 18:43, Chris Wilson wrote:
>>> Use the upper s32 for the output, so again you are not overwriting user
>>> state without good reason.
>> Makes sense. Will do.
> It would also be useful (for nefarious reasons) to only copy back the
> rsvd2 field, i.e. keep it as DRM_IOW(EXECBUFFER2) and do the small
> fixed-sized copy_to_user of rsvd2 as required. That means we can avoid
> the copy mostly, and treat args as a private copy of the user
> parameters, i.e. space we can scribble over with impunity.
Won't that be an abuse of abi? If we write memory we should mark the struct as writable, and make sure we don't touch the user execbuffer2 at all until the call succeeds.
More information about the Intel-gfx