[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm-intel: Document sob requirements better
Daniel Vetter
daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch
Fri Jan 22 08:39:24 PST 2016
Yeah dim apply-patch could probably autofudge this, but it's too close
to w/e time for me to figure out how to do that.
Noticed since a few folks forgot this when pushing other people's
patches.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com>
---
drm-intel.rst | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drm-intel.rst b/drm-intel.rst
index cf58d64af1aa..35800ecc700f 100644
--- a/drm-intel.rst
+++ b/drm-intel.rst
@@ -346,6 +346,9 @@ An inexhaustive list of details to check:
* The patch does not introduce new `sparse` warnings.
+* When pushing someone else's patch you must add your own signed-off per
+ http://developercertificate.org/.
+
On Confidence, Complexity, and Transparency
-------------------------------------------
--
2.7.0.rc3
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list