[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/ringbuffer: Move all generic engine->dispatch_batchbuffer together

Tvrtko Ursulin tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Fri Jul 1 08:40:28 UTC 2016


On 01/07/16 09:18, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Consolidate the block of default vfuncs for dispatching the batchbuffer.
> Just a minor tweak on top of Tvrtko's great job of tidying up the vfunc
> initialisation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 27 ++++++++++++++-------------
>   1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> index 4d61ea923154..caebe812d10f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> @@ -2991,25 +2991,29 @@ static void intel_ring_default_vfuncs(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>   	engine->get_seqno = ring_get_seqno;
>   	engine->set_seqno = ring_set_seqno;
>
> -	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 8) {
> -		engine->dispatch_execbuffer = gen8_ring_dispatch_execbuffer;
> +	engine->add_request = i9xx_add_request;
> +	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 6)
>   		engine->add_request = gen6_add_request;
> -		engine->irq_seqno_barrier = gen6_seqno_barrier;
> -	} else if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 6) {
> +
> +	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 8)
> +		engine->dispatch_execbuffer = gen8_ring_dispatch_execbuffer;
> +	else if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 6)
>   		engine->dispatch_execbuffer = gen6_ring_dispatch_execbuffer;
> -		engine->add_request = gen6_add_request;
> -		engine->irq_seqno_barrier = gen6_seqno_barrier;
> -	} else {
> +	else if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 4)
>   		engine->dispatch_execbuffer = i965_dispatch_execbuffer;
> -		engine->add_request = i9xx_add_request;
> -	}
> +	else if (IS_I830(dev_priv) || IS_845G(dev_priv))
> +		engine->dispatch_execbuffer = i830_dispatch_execbuffer;
> +	else
> +		engine->dispatch_execbuffer = i915_dispatch_execbuffer;
>
>   	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 8) {
>   		engine->irq_get = gen8_ring_get_irq;
>   		engine->irq_put = gen8_ring_put_irq;
> +		engine->irq_seqno_barrier = gen6_seqno_barrier;
>   	} else if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 6) {
>   		engine->irq_get = gen6_ring_get_irq;
>   		engine->irq_put = gen6_ring_put_irq;
> +		engine->irq_seqno_barrier = gen6_seqno_barrier;
>   	} else if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 5) {
>   		engine->irq_get = gen5_ring_get_irq;
>   		engine->irq_put = gen5_ring_put_irq;
> @@ -3069,10 +3073,7 @@ int intel_init_render_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev)
>
>   	if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv))
>   		engine->dispatch_execbuffer = hsw_ring_dispatch_execbuffer;
> -	else if (IS_I830(dev_priv) || IS_845G(dev_priv))
> -		engine->dispatch_execbuffer = i830_dispatch_execbuffer;
> -	else if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) <= 3)
> -		engine->dispatch_execbuffer = i915_dispatch_execbuffer;
> +
>   	engine->init_hw = init_render_ring;
>   	engine->cleanup = render_ring_cleanup;

I was planning to do this today after your comment from yesterday, which 
I was agreeing with, but you beat me to it. No complaints about that. :)

Looks correct.

Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>

Regards,

Tvrtko






More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list