[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Limit i915_ring_test_irq debugfs to actual rings

[Mika Kuoppala]

Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:

> For simplicity in testing, only report known rings in the mask. This
> allows userspace to try and trigger a missed irq on every ring and do a
> comparison between i915_ring_test_irq and i915_ring_missed_irq to see if
> any rings failed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 9 +--------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index 3da36db9c830..1da821479161 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -4615,17 +4615,10 @@ i915_ring_test_irq_set(void *data, u64 val)
>  {
>  	struct drm_device *dev = data;
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> -	int ret;
>  
>  	DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Masking interrupts on rings 0x%08llx\n", val);

Moving this dbg message past masking would make more sense?

Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at intel.com>

> -
> -	/* Lock against concurrent debugfs callers */
> -	ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&dev->struct_mutex);
> -	if (ret)
> -		return ret;
> -
> +	val &= INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->ring_mask;
>  	dev_priv->gpu_error.test_irq_rings = val;
> -	mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> -- 
> 2.8.1