[Intel-gfx] [CI 6/8] drm/i915: Disable waitboosting for mmioflips/semaphores

[Chris Wilson]

Since commit a6f766f39751 ("drm/i915: Limit ring synchronisation (sw
sempahores) RPS boosts") and commit bcafc4e38b6a ("drm/i915: Limit mmio
flip RPS boosts") we have limited the waitboosting for semaphores and
flips. Ideally we do not want to boost in either of these instances as no
userspace consumer is waiting upon the results (though a userspace producer
may be stalled trying to submit an execbuf - but in this case the
producer is being throttled due to the engine being saturated with
work). With the introduction of NO_WAITBOOST in the previous patch, we
can finally disable these needless boosts.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c  | 8 +-------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h      | 2 --
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c      | 2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c      | 2 --
 5 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
index 55fd3d9cc448..618f8cf210fc 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
@@ -2465,13 +2465,7 @@ static int i915_rps_boost_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
 			   list_empty(&file_priv->rps.link) ? "" : ", active");
 		rcu_read_unlock();
 	}
-	seq_printf(m, "Semaphore boosts: %d%s\n",
-		   dev_priv->rps.semaphores.boosts,
-		   list_empty(&dev_priv->rps.semaphores.link) ? "" : ", active");
-	seq_printf(m, "MMIO flip boosts: %d%s\n",
-		   dev_priv->rps.mmioflips.boosts,
-		   list_empty(&dev_priv->rps.mmioflips.link) ? "" : ", active");
-	seq_printf(m, "Kernel boosts: %d\n", dev_priv->rps.boosts);
+	seq_printf(m, "Kernel (anonymous) boosts: %d\n", dev_priv->rps.boosts);
 	spin_unlock(&dev_priv->rps.client_lock);
 	mutex_unlock(&dev->filelist_mutex);
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index c97a75597099..e163a9487750 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -1195,8 +1195,6 @@ struct intel_gen6_power_mgmt {
 	struct delayed_work autoenable_work;
 	unsigned boosts;
 
-	struct intel_rps_client semaphores, mmioflips;
-
 	/* manual wa residency calculations */
 	struct intel_rps_ei up_ei, down_ei;
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index 61729d6b4ecc..079e09cee16a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -2849,7 +2849,7 @@ __i915_gem_object_sync(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
 		ret = __i915_wait_request(from_req,
 					  i915->mm.interruptible,
 					  NULL,
-					  &i915->rps.semaphores);
+					  NO_WAITBOOST);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index fb7d8fc5b0e6..51fbca756cdb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -11473,7 +11473,7 @@ static void intel_mmio_flip_work_func(struct work_struct *w)
 	if (work->flip_queued_req)
 		WARN_ON(__i915_wait_request(work->flip_queued_req,
 					    false, NULL,
-					    &dev_priv->rps.mmioflips));
+					    NO_WAITBOOST));
 
 	/* For framebuffer backed by dmabuf, wait for fence */
 	resv = i915_gem_object_get_dmabuf_resv(obj);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index fa6b341c2792..a1bf5f8fbb1c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -7810,8 +7810,6 @@ void intel_pm_setup(struct drm_device *dev)
 	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&dev_priv->rps.autoenable_work,
 			  __intel_autoenable_gt_powersave);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev_priv->rps.clients);
-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev_priv->rps.semaphores.link);
-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev_priv->rps.mmioflips.link);
 
 	dev_priv->pm.suspended = false;
 	atomic_set(&dev_priv->pm.wakeref_count, 0);
-- 
2.8.1