[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/31] drm/i915: Only drop the batch-pool's object reference

Chris Wilson chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Mon Jul 25 08:44:16 UTC 2016


On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 11:38:07AM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> On ma, 2016-07-25 at 08:44 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > The obj->batch_pool_link is only inspected when traversing the batch
> > pool list and when on the batch pool list the object is referenced. Thus
> > when freeing the batch pool list, we only need to unreference the object
> > and do not have to worry about the obj->batch_pool_link.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_batch_pool.c | 13 ++++++-------
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_batch_pool.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_batch_pool.c
> > index 3507b2753fd3..825981b5aa40 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_batch_pool.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_batch_pool.c
> > @@ -68,15 +68,14 @@ void i915_gem_batch_pool_fini(struct i915_gem_batch_pool *pool)
> >  	WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&pool->dev->struct_mutex));
> >  
> >  	for (n = 0; n < ARRAY_SIZE(pool->cache_list); n++) {
> > -		while (!list_empty(&pool->cache_list[n])) {
> > -			struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj =
> > -				list_first_entry(&pool->cache_list[n],
> > -						 struct drm_i915_gem_object,
> > -						 batch_pool_link);
> > +		struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, *next;
> >  
> > -			list_del(&obj->batch_pool_link);
> > +		list_for_each_entry_safe(obj, next,
> 
> Why _safe? i915_gem_free_object does not touch the batch_pool_link.

Not directly, but it does free the memory including the batch_pool_link. :)
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list